Do you agree or disagree?
Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays.
Teachers have been known as the second parents of children. They can either pave the way for further progress or destroy a child's perspective of education, so they have a significant role in one's life. One of the heated debates in this realm is that whether teachers had a higher reputation among people in the past. However, there might be some counterexamples about this claim I would argue that today, teachers are not as valued as past. Following reasons will further elaborate on this issue.
The first prominent point to be mentioned is that the digital revolution has altered many aspects of family lives. In fact, many families have been transformed into child-centered ones in which parents put a premium on their children’s’ needs. As a result, youths are the ones who can set the rules and ask other family members to follow them. Finally, one day, these adolescents will go to the school, and subsequently, they would try to boss around their teachers as well, and that is why in modern schools, it seems somehow teachers are under the control of students. Consequently, teachers like other adults are not respected enough. For instance, when I was in my high school, we did not use to eat foodstuffs during lesson time. However, I cannot ask my students now to stop eating when I am in the classroom since their parents would support them instead of punishing for this rude behavior.
The second rationale behind my idea is rooted in the fact that, modern life has altered not only the moral norms of families but also the teachers'. It is an undeniable fact that teaching is not a high- paying job, and it is based only on dedication and patience. However, nowadays, more and more teachers are teaching their students only for money than ever before. As a result, teachers are losing their position and value in the society after a while. Therefore, I believe that the negative view of teachers’ value in societies is the result of their own behavior.
To wrap it up, based on the ideas that were presented above I strongly believe that teachers are not appreciated like before since modern life has changed the social and moral norms of both families and teachers. Let us hope that more and more new teachers try to protect their position in societies by following experienced teachers’ ways.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | Shiimaaa | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | Shiimaaa | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | farzaddanaei | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-31 | Abbas.ghaffari | 76 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | Maryam Madson | 61 | view |
- TPO21 – Independent: A/D? For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school. 83
- People benefit more from travelling in their own country than from travelling to foreign countries. 81
- TPO22-teachers should not make their political and social point of views known to students 80
- tpo25.2 88
- TPO18(independent)Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends. 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 192, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ion, so they have a significant role in ones life. One of the heated debates in this...
^^^^
Line 2, column 703, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...hen I was in my high school, we did not use to eat foodstuffs during lesson time. H...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, in fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1934.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 398.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85929648241 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74901012002 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537688442211 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 600.3 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8730856611 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.789473684 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9473684211 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.52631578947 5.45110844103 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2050788755 0.236089414692 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0594835092196 0.076458572812 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0607232446115 0.0737576698707 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131527055673 0.150856017488 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0593314949559 0.0645574589148 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.