Colleges and universities should require their students to spend at least one semester studying in a foreign country.
Nowadays is a concrete international trend to maintain that students are meant to spend a period of time abroad to strengthen their curricula and to become dependable workers. Nonetheless, there are several factors that can prove this as an incorrect platitude, as sometimes it is not logical to even require students to go abroad for any number of months. Among the many reasons for this are that: different courses of study have to be considered in their several different characteristics when comparing them with their foreign equal courses; money efforts required to go abroad can result in a unequal policy; some universities find no advantages in sending their students abroad, as the best they can seek for is in those same universities. These three aspects will now be qualified.
Each different study plan can have both advantages and disadvantages in studying in a foreign country, to begin with. For instance, consider study careers such as Law and Engineering. The first is a technical social subject through which students deepen their knowledge on several aspects of legal order and national assets strictly related to their country with only few comparisons with other foreign law systems: for such a course, experiencing a period of study abroad can result in a waste of time if there is no clear intention of specializing in international compared law. For this reason, it is to be considered unequivocal that students of Law have no real reasons to be required to spend even one single semester abroad. Engineering, on the other side, shows diametrical opposite feature: as a scientific degree, it focuses on world-wide shared issues and queries, thus being easily suitable for a period spent in another country. What is more, it is possible to maintain that in most circumstances abroad universities can more well-equipped with laboratories and advance structures for research. For these reasons, is it possible to state that a foreign university is not surely tantamount to a local one as far as engineering is considered, and not requiring students to study abroad would possibly be a parochial decision.
At the same time, though, it is unavoidable to consider the financial factor. Money can indeed be an inconvenient obstacle, and, in many cases, it can turn out to be the key for the planning of a period of study abroad. It seems reasonable, then, that this hypothetical policy of universities, namely, declaring that at least one semester abroad is mandatory, has to be adapted to the financial conditions of the single student. If this is not possible, that is, if colleges cannot sustain students in their abroad activities, then it is to be considered even unequal to force family to this sort of effort, whereas, if schools have the necessary funds to help students to deal with the economical demand, it sounds correct to implement the discussed policy.
Nevertheless, perhaps the main crucial condition that must be analysed is the quality of a college, thus qualifying the motivations to go abroad. In fact, it is widely accepted that the pivotal aspect of studying in a foreign country is not only the life-enriching experience itself, but the prestige of the University the students go to in order to add a high-quality preparation in their professional curricula. Aligning to this point of view, the circumstance that has a preponderant role in the decision of whether or not to adopt the considered recommendation is: is the University standing out among the other in the specific subject the student is specializing? If the answer is affirmative, then there is no real motivation to require the specific student to go abroad. Otherwise, the considered experience made abroad would be a wise occurrence for his curriculum.
In conclusion, the policy in question has to be strictly referred to each different circumstance and, consequently, cannot be adopted widely and without differences.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-24 | Anirudha Balaji Shirsikar | 50 | view |
| 2021-07-21 | ajay@123 | 83 | view |
- Politicians should pursue common ground and reasonable consensus rather than elusive ideals. 70
- It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves. 83
- The following was written as a part of an application for a small-business loan by a group of developers in the city of Monroe."A jazz music club in Monroe would be a tremendously profitable enterprise. Currently, the nearest jazz club is 65 miles aw 78
- It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves. 70
- Politicians should pursue common ground and reasonable consensus rather than elusive ideals. 16
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 91, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...tain that students are meant to spend a period of time abroad to strengthen their curricula an...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 458, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'several'.
Suggestion: several
...of study have to be considered in their several different characteristics when comparing them wit...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 596, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...rts required to go abroad can result in a unequal policy; some universities find ...
^
Line 7, column 512, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
... a preponderant role in the decision of whether or not to adopt the considered recommendation ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, then, thus, well, whereas, as to, at least, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, sort of, such as, in many cases, to begin with, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 41.0 19.5258426966 210% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 33.0505617978 136% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 92.0 58.6224719101 157% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3304.0 2235.4752809 148% => OK
No of words: 640.0 442.535393258 145% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1625 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.02973371873 4.55969084622 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08448106454 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 298.0 215.323595506 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.465625 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1054.8 704.065955056 150% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 23.0359550562 130% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 95.4529481269 60.3974514979 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.333333333 118.986275619 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.4761904762 23.4991977007 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 5.21951772744 185% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27129883731 0.243740707755 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0816676434473 0.0831039109588 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0633765372446 0.0758088955206 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141225149992 0.150359130593 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0780906504951 0.0667264976115 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 14.1392134831 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 48.8420337079 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 12.1743820225 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.24 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 165.0 100.480337079 164% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 11.8971910112 164% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 11.2143820225 125% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.