summerise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific point made in the reading passage.
In this set of materials, the reading part describes a method in order to protect turtles that are called TED then explains the problems of this approach and listening section cast doubt on the information presented in the passage and argues that TED is an appropriate method for protecting turtles and she says that TED can be useful for environment.
First, the passage points of that turtle's cache in net seldom. However, the lecturer makes the point that there are thousands of shipment and if a turtle is caught by shipments every month, many turtles will have died.
second according to the text shipments can use another method for protecting them. the speaker disagrees with this point, and, asserts that time limit is not accomplishing because the government can not monitor all of the shipments and this is a theoretical claim.
Third, the article claims that TEDs not only small but also useless because do not revive turtles.on the contrary, the lecturer points out that there is not any problem for small TEDs and companies can modify them in produce modified TEDs for instance large TEDs.
In conclusion, the talk bolsters the mentioned pieces of the information in the passage
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-04 | salarmoheb | 3 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | salarmoheb | 3 | view |
| 2019-10-08 | salarmoheb | 80 | view |
| 2018-12-15 | salarmoheb | 90 | view |
| 2018-12-03 | salarmoheb | 3 | view |
- summerise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific point made in the reading passage. 88
- summerise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific point made in the reading passage. 70
- do you agree or disagree with the following statement? it is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. use specific reasons and examples to suppo 70
- do you agree or disagree with the following statement? famous entertainers and athletics deserve to have more privacy than they have now.use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- summerise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific point made in the reading passage. 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 207, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[4]
Message: Did you mean 'will be' or 'has been'?
Suggestion: will be; has been
...y shipments every months, many turtules will been died. second according to the text shi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Second
... months, many turtules will been died. second according to the text shipments can use...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 83, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...use another method for protecting them. the speaker disagree whith this point, and,...
^^^
Line 3, column 211, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...g because the goverment can not moniter all of the shipments and this is a theoritical cla...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 6, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
... and this is a theoritical claim. Third,the article calims that TEDs not only small...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, then, third, for instance, in conclusion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 30.3222958057 63% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 995.0 1373.03311258 72% => OK
No of words: 198.0 270.72406181 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02525252525 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57312699896 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 145.348785872 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.616161616162 0.540411800872 114% => OK
syllable_count: 297.9 419.366225166 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 13.0662251656 46% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 21.2450331126 155% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 114.294454031 49.2860985944 232% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 165.833333333 110.228320801 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.0 21.698381199 152% => OK
Discourse Markers: 16.6666666667 7.06452816374 236% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 4.33554083885 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0793532092734 0.272083759551 29% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0347831840568 0.0996497079465 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0265167811071 0.0662205650399 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0375644161336 0.162205337803 23% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0215151093092 0.0443174109184 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 13.3589403974 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.44 53.8541721854 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.0289183223 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.49 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.42419426049 112% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.498013245 145% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.