Establishing good relationships in the workplace is not important, as the primary goal of every person is to focus on work.
To what extent do you agree with this statement?
Either relationship with colleagues at the work is important or not is a debating topic now-a-days. it is argued by some people that to befriend with colleagues doesn’t matter because at place of work the principal objective is to concentrate on duties. this essay will discuss why I completely disagree with this proposition because it is far too draconian.
The main reason why forming the decent connection at the office is vital is because it improves work productivity. As interactions are the means by which work occurs, the good interpersonal relations among colleagues lead towards the better teamwork. For instance, Helen keller says, “alone we can do little; together we can do so much”. In short, there is no denying the fact that team members who like each other tend to collaborate on a project more effectively.
A secondary reason why to form social bonds at a place of work is necessary is because employees spend most part of their life-waking hours- at work; so, it is positive and very beneficial to have a warm friendship with people who surround you most of the time. For example, a neuroscience researcher says, because human beings are naturally social creatures, our interactions with others are just as vital as food and water. For these reasons, clearly, it is a bad idea to not get closer with colleagues and just do your work.
this essay discussed why to make bonds with co-workers is important because it improves their work performance and positively affects the social life of workers. In my opinion, I totally disagree with the statement that being on good terms with colleagues is not necessary as the main concern of every employee is to fulfill his work assignments.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-10 | swasthani | 61 | view |
| 2021-07-13 | sssssse | 63 | view |
| 2021-03-16 | fowzan | 78 | view |
| 2020-07-24 | katenokk84 | 78 | view |
| 2020-04-19 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 11 | view |
- Rich countries should allow jobs for skilled and knowledgeable employees who are from poor countries. Do you agree or disagree? 67
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as south pole. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Most modern families have both parents working and as a result children spend less and less time with their parents.What is the reason for this?What problems can this cause? 70
- The bat chart below gives information about vehicle ownership in China.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information. 61
- Ensuring that children have regular physical exercise should be the responsibility of parents and therefore schools should not waste valuable school time having sports lessons as part of the curriculum 65
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 101, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
... or not is a debating topic now-a-days. it is argued by some people that to befrie...
^^
Line 1, column 260, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
... objective is to concentrate on duties. this essay will discuss why I completely dis...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...th colleagues and just do your work. this essay discussed why to make bonds with ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, so, for example, for instance, in short, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1440.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01742160279 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93057251919 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567944250871 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7629004277 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.0 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9166666667 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185871491664 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0721758596847 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0434453677798 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122355950343 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0379663186665 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.