The table below shows the number of visitors
The table and the pie chart give information about the figures of people who visit Ashdown Museum and their level of satisfaction during its pre-refurbishment and post-refurbishment
Overall, it is noticeable that the sum of visitors rose significantly after Ashdown Museum was refurbished while, visitors’ attitudes towards their visit in this museum varied greatly between the two periods.
It can be seen from the table that there was a sharp increase in the number of museum of visitors as the figure after the refurbishment was one and a half times higher than that of the pre-refurbishment period. Specifically, the number of Ashdown museum goers before refurbishment was 74000 people whereas afterwards, there were totally 92000 visitors.
Before it was refurbished, the museum received a relatively low level of satisfaction from visitors as those who felt “very satisfied” and “satisfied” only accounted for nearly half of the respondents yet after the refurbishment, the statistic of these categories took up three fourths of the survey results. In conjunction with the rise in the figure of positive feedback about the museum, the proportion of “dissatisfied” and “very dissatisfied” visitors declined substantially from 50 percent before refurbishment to 20 percent after refurbishment. A group that witnessed no alteration was “no response” which remained at 5 percent throughout the period.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-12-05 | Trần Ánh Vy | 67 | view |
2024-11-30 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | view |
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women 73
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010. 73
- The table below shows the number of visitors 78
- Some people say that the only reason for learning a foreign language is in order to travel to or work in a foreign country. Others say that these are not the only reasons why someone should learn a foreign language.Discuss both these views and give your o 73
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from home is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their wast 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 3.97073170732 353% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1256.0 965.302439024 130% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.84186046512 4.92477711251 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.90901386537 2.65546596893 147% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581395348837 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 380.7 283.868780488 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 22.4926829268 156% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 99.5701874168 43.030603864 231% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 209.333333333 112.824112599 186% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.8333333333 22.9334400587 156% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11195265368 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.064170540285 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.051778986576 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0813897467403 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0446954591426 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 24.0 13.2329268293 181% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 19.03 61.2550243902 31% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 6.51609756098 224% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 19.3 10.3012195122 187% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.18 11.4140731707 151% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.06136585366 121% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.0 11.4329268293 184% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.9970731707 145% => OK
text_standard: 24.0 11.0658536585 217% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.