some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business, and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to share freely.
In today's world, there is an enormous controversy for the topic that the information should be shared freely or not, specially in the sectors like business, educational and scientific. I believe that it depends on the type and purpose of the information Let us look it from both perspectives in the above paragraph.
It is widely believed that many brains can reduce the efforts and increase the efficiency of a particular task. However, to complete that task successfully, the team plays an important role. The most vital task in a group is to spread the information among each other while it can also help in maintaining good relation among employees or student, they might feel more connected, can get social easily and can work together more often. For instance, the work comparison of the one student and group of student is drastic, the group can manage to do the work in fewer hours and can represent very well output whereas the student alone can not make it in time despite of amount of knowledge he might have. This shows the importance of awareness of information among each other.
On the other hand, some corporation has classified information of their product or research. They spend a gargantuan amount of money on research and development, in this case spreading knowledge can lead to a great loss. It can be seen in the following example, the Samsung planning to launch foldable phone next year, but the information regarding this technology has not been revealed because other company can imitate their design. If the company will share the information about it, it may face a huge financial crisis in the future. So, some information should not be disclosed until a specific period of time.
In conclusion, the sharing of information is totally dependent on its type and purpose. As a team, awareness can play an essential role for the efficiency of a task and making relations while in the competition, it can result in an enormous loss because some information is too valuable or too important to be shared freely.
- Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject. 73
- It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops. Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view? 61
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as the South Pole.What are advantages and disadvantages of this development? 73
- The diagram below shows how coffee is produced and prepared for sale in supermarkets and shops.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 75
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 601, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...hould not be disclosed until a specific period of time. In conclusion, the sharing of infor...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, may, regarding, so, well, whereas, while, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 1.00243902439 1796% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 5.60731707317 428% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 3.97073170732 403% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1705.0 965.302439024 177% => OK
No of words: 346.0 196.424390244 176% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92774566474 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 3.73543355544 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78707590639 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 106.607317073 178% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549132947977 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 283.868780488 190% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 1.53170731707 522% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.3044029248 43.030603864 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.785714286 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7142857143 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 5.23603664747 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277693212824 0.215688989381 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104050274023 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0695135697092 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183290433766 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0720370684091 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 40.7170731707 206% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.