Knowing that the percentage of positive reviews increased
Knowing that the percentage of positive reviews increased, one would agree with the director's opinion that more advertisements are needed. However, that opinion lacks some important aspects. The fact the movies had more attendance in the past years indicate that people knows about the company movies, but they are getting away from watching it for some reasons.
One reason maybe the content of these movies became less attractive to the majority of the viewers. Hence many viewers stop following up with the company, and started to see different movies. Moreover, the content of the last year movies seems to suit a lesser portion of the old viewers, and that would explain the increase of positive review percentage. In view of that, if the same number of views as old years happened the past year, the percentage of postive reveiws may hugely decrease.
Although increasing the advertising may increase the views by attracting people who like that type of contents and were not aware of its exsistance, that will affect the budget of the Super Screen Movie Production Company as well as the time spared for creating the movies. That may decrease the quality of the up coming movies, and end up losing some of the remaining followers.
In light of the above, the director should advice the company to improve the content of the upcoming movies. One way would be to study the views and reviews of other movies from other competitive companies, and see what content is currently attracting viewers.
- sea otter of the Neighboring Eastern Carpenteria 58
- Claim Group assignments that students must work together to complete should replace a substantial amount of traditional lecture based instruction in college and university courses Reason It is vital for students to gain experience collaborating with peers 35
- Knowing that the percentage of positive reviews increased 50
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports (swimming, boating and fishing) among their favorite recreational activities. The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits, however, and the city park department devotes littl 50
- devoting more time for weather an local news 43
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 85, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'directors'' or 'director's'?
Suggestion: directors'; director's
...ews increased, one would agree with the directors opinion that more advertisements are ne...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 101, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ractive to the majority of the viewers. Hence many viewers stop following up with the...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 348, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...the up coming movies, and end up losing some of the remaining followers. In light of the...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 44, Rule ID: GIVE_ADVISE[4]
Message: Did you mean 'advise' (a verb)?
Suggestion: advise
...light of the above, the director should advice the company to improve the content of t...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 19.6327345309 25% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.9520958084 62% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 11.1786427146 63% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 13.6137724551 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 28.8173652695 45% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 55.5748502994 68% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 16.3942115768 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1260.0 2260.96107784 56% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 251.0 441.139720559 57% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01992031873 5.12650576532 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.56307096286 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49196101186 2.78398813304 90% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 204.123752495 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569721115538 0.468620217663 122% => OK
syllable_count: 390.6 705.55239521 55% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.76447105788 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.67365269461 299% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 19.7664670659 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.8473053892 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.0263648304 57.8364921388 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.545454545 119.503703932 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8181818182 23.324526521 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.45454545455 5.70786347227 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.25449101796 76% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.20758483034 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 6.88822355289 29% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211094998637 0.218282227539 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0716037510839 0.0743258471296 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102073609539 0.0701772020484 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116359989587 0.128457276422 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0674392138473 0.0628817314937 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.3799401198 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.3550499002 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.197005988 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.5979740519 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.32208582834 103% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 98.500998004 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 12.3882235529 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.1389221557 97% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.