Computers are increasingly used in education. In which areas do you think are computers more important and in which areas are teachers more important?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
In today’s world, computers are essential in many areas of my life – medical, accounting and including education. It has always been a controversial issue over whether the computers or lecturers are deemed more significant for the training system. While people argue that the latter alternative would be better for students, I firmly believe that both are indispensable in children’s learning.
It is true that in some areas of education, computers could be more necessary than teachers. Application of computers in the arena of academics is well-acknowledged by all people around the world. For instance, for distance learning system, online courses are very prevalent and a plethora of websites provide videos and networked tutorials for students who can learn fundamental concepts over the web in absence of instruction. With abundant materials and references, students can access the information which they want to have a deeper insight into a filed or a study. Additionally, computers can process a huge amount of data per second and thus can be more advantageous to learners while conducting research work or in scientific experiments.
On the contrary, in the learning and practice of more complex ideas, the computer is not adequate. A computer can evaluate an answer as right or wrong, but it can not determine why. It can not find out why a student is making mistakes and then represent important concepts in a different way so the student will understand. It cannot verify at what stage in a mathematics problem the student has made an error. Furthermore, a teacher not only teaches us lessons from academic books, they actually but also instill most important human characteristics among us such as morality and all the good quantities of life where computers have almost zero contributions in doing so. Teachers are more important in explaining intricacies of academic and personal life and can become great mentors for students. In all these cases, a human teacher seems crucial in class
In conclusion, both computers and teachers play equally important roles in children’s various stage of their education.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-04 | huathibichngoc.c3.ltt@gmail.com | 78 | view |
| 2018-12-21 | maatxym | 89 | view |
- In some countries, secondary schools aim to provide a general education across a range of subjects. In others, children focus on a narrow range of subjects related to a particular career. Which of these two systems is more appropriate in today's worl 61
- News editors decide what to broadcast on television and what to write in newspapers. What factors influence these decisions? Do you think we become used to bad news? Should more good news be reported? 73
- In some countries, secondary schools aim to provide a general education across a range of subjects. In others, children focus on a narrow range of subjects related to a particular career.Which of these two systems is more appropriate in today’s world? 89
- Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later, and it is often argued that these are the best people to talk to teenagers about the dangers of committing a crime.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- In most successful organisations some people believe that communications between managers and workers are important other people said that other factors are more important Discuss both sides and give your opinion 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 274, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a different way" with adverb for "different"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...s and then represent important concepts in a different way so the student will understand. It cann...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, furthermore, if, second, so, still, then, thus, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, it is true, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1810.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30791788856 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12060390732 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607038123167 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 568.8 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7840744941 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.666666667 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7333333333 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.8 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259016885424 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0853396161418 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0535995871004 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154259687201 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0100292405747 0.056905535591 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.