The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in the future. Do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of learning ability and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that improve situation of futur can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, learning languages can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that online teaching, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of bilingual and lingustics apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, improving communication skills might increase the consequences of job promotion. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of foreign languages.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of futuristic far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of global languages prove the significance of globalization, but also pinpoint thorny issues’ potential implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-26 | msgnaneswaran | 11 | view |
| 2019-04-06 | mohab.elhaddad | 85 | view |
| 2019-04-02 | foadihasan | 77 | view |
| 2019-04-01 | Fernanda Giorge | 55 | view |
| 2019-02-17 | Mahdi_Farhani | 80 | view |
- In the education system, assessment through written formal examination is valid or not? 11
- Nowadays tv has become an essential part of life. Medium tospread news and awareness and for some it acts like acompanion. What is your Opinion about this ? 88
- Medical technology is responsible for the human’s life expectancy. To the what extent do you agree or dis-agree? 80
- Some students work while studying. This often results in lacking time for education and constantly feeling under pressure. What do you think are the causes of this? What solutions can you suggest? 80
- The university will deduct the student's score for late assignments, opinions and solutions. Or Should University penalize students for late submission of their work? 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1326.0 1207.87684729 110% => OK
No of words: 227.0 242.827586207 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.84140969163 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34380096164 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 139.433497537 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.718061674009 0.580463131201 124% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 379.143842365 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9144834824 50.4703680194 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.545454545 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6363636364 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.36363636364 7.25397266985 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0971833865643 0.242375264174 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0305400006694 0.0925447433944 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0347598011186 0.071462118173 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0487206645173 0.151781067708 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0312065969028 0.0609392437508 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 12.6369458128 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 53.1260098522 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.59 11.5310837438 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.51 8.32886699507 138% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 55.0591133005 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.