The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton.
As is illustrated by the line graph, depicts the information about the proportion of England people who visited Brighton to watch the attractions from 1980 to 2010.
Taking a quick glance, it is quite evident that the highest trend was marked in pavilion in England people who visited the Brighton and it was lowest in pier.
As can be seen from the graph, the proportion of tourists stood at 25% in 1980 who went to Brighton to watch the pavilion and it rose dramatically from 1985 to 1995. However, in 1995 the percentage of England tourists reached at peak point and from 1995 to 2000 and the proportion of UK people fell gradually. Moving further, the number of England people who visited Brighton to see the art gallery from 1980 to 1985 and oscillations trend was accounted from 1985 to 2010. Further more, festival was lowest attraction among the UK people. Moreover, the fluctuation trend was noticeable in pier in 1980 to 2010 among the England people.
- International migration in UK 56
- Some people think cars are better way of transportation around the city. While, other prefer cycling. Discuss both views and give your opinion? 56
- Car ownership 73
- The charts below show degrees granted in different fields at the national university in the years 1990,2000,and 2010. 56
- Consumer good 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 497, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'was the lowest'.
Suggestion: was the lowest
...om 1985 to 2010. Further more, festival was lowest attraction among the UK people. Moreove...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, moreover
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 801.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79640718563 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57746698957 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 81.0 106.607317073 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.48502994012 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 218.7 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.7906376733 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.428571429 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8571428571 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.42857142857 5.23603664747 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261396924314 0.215688989381 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130800038145 0.103423049105 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0825148160937 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213266987925 0.15604864568 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0715661149941 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.