The bar chart and the table
The table chart narrate the portion of phone and computer employers in 6 different countries. The data is calibrated in per thousand user.
Overall.it is lucid that the number of computer user was higher than the cell phone user in majority of given countries.
According to the data,Luxemburg is the only nation where citizens use both gadgets more than the remaining countries drivers. In contrast, only 10% headphone and computer holder out of 100 percentages in China this amount extremely low as compared to Luxemburg. Furthermore, 684 handset boss out of 1000 are live in Singapore. this numbers are slightly lower than the owner of computer in same community in 2003. On other hand, the gap between the mobile phone and computer handler in Italy was high which is approximately 220 people more telephone enjoy in similar conditions.South Korea and germany shared the equal part of cellular phone and electronic brain operator which is 484 out of 1000 persons. computer user in germany and South korea is 240 and 300 respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-10 | nobitaa | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | nobitaa | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view | |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view | |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view |
- Some people think that people should choose their job based on income in order to provide security for their family.Do you think money is an important factor when choosing a job?What other factors should be considered 61
- Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later, and it is often argued that these are the best people to talk to teenagers about the dangers of committing a crime. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 73
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999.( IELTS BOOK 4 TEST 1) 11
- Restoration of old buildings in main cities involves enormous government expenditure. It would be more beneficial to spend this money to build new houses and roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include examples 84
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free.Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The table chart narrate the portion of p...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 22, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , Luxemburg
... given countries. According to the data,Luxemburg is the only nation where citizens use b...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 286, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d to Luxemburg. Furthermore, 684 handset boss out of 1000 are live in Singapore. ...
^^
Line 4, column 328, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...boss out of 1000 are live in Singapore. this numbers are slightly lower than the own...
^^^^
Line 4, column 539, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h which is approximately 220 people more telephone enjoy in similar conditions.S...
^^
Line 4, column 550, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...approximately 220 people more telephone enjoy in similar conditions.South Korea ...
^^
Line 4, column 580, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: South
... telephone enjoy in similar conditions.South Korea and germany shared the equal part...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 708, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Computer
...rator which is 484 out of 1000 persons. computer user in germany and South korea is 240 ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 872.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09941520468 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84134709402 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625730994152 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 69.3189087559 43.030603864 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.8888888889 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.55555555556 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0489013313762 0.215688989381 23% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0280154118828 0.103423049105 27% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0792395508803 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0659510616466 0.15604864568 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0932688858335 0.0819641961636 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.