Some countries today have passed laws against smoking tobacco in public places such as office and restaurants, other countries have not attention of doing this.
Discuss both views and give opinion
Smoking causes health consequences; therefore, some nations have introduced legislations against smoking in public premises such as workplaces, parks, and schools etc. However, other countries have not yet undertaken certain rules to prohibit smoking into public places. This essay will discuss both views and before formulating final opinion.
Perhaps the most appropriate reason for prohibition of smoking in public places is health hazards to non-smokers. As a cigarette emissions dangerous aliments into the air, so these aliments leads to health consequences such as asthma, heart illness, lung infections to other individuals. Hence, this practice is responsible for to enforce strict clauses against smoking by governments. For instance, INDIA has passed legislations to prevent smoking in public places, and have provision of fine and sentence. What is more, if anyone who will not follow the laws, so, that will be charged for fine as well as six month of sentence also.
On the other hand, the tax and revenue which is collected from tobacco industries probably does not allow to introducing some rules against it. Thus, the profit is being treated as prior base by some governments rather than to imposing rules. A part from that, the inadequate information about smoking affects on human beings may responsible for to unawareness of making regulations for passive smoking. For example, before 2014 in INDIA, there was not any kind of clause for smoking. Although, after awareness of smoking problems, the attention of political leaders had been caught, and thus such laws had been enforced in country
To sum up, obviously, smoking has variety of drawbacks, and this is the main cause of disease as well even for non-smokers. Thus, numerous of nations have enforced laws toward smoking habit in public area. However, some nations have not done yet. Overall, it is generally seems that smoking causes illness, so it is very imperative to have flexible rules to set this habit into limited area.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-20 | Nishitaaaa | 22 | view |
- Some people think that to reduce traffic and pollution the government should increase tax on petrol diesel Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 53
- Some people believe that there should be fixed punishment for each type of crime, other, However, argue that the circumstances of an individuals and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken in to account when the deciding on the punishment 67
- Some people think that modern technology is making people more sociable, while others think it is making them less sociable, discuss both views and give opinion. 89
- Some countries today have passed laws against smoking tobacco in public places such as office and restaurants, other countries have not attention of doing this.Discuss both views and give opinion 84
- Nowadays culture is more or less the same around the world as compare in the past Is this a positive or negative trend 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 612, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'month' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'months'.
Suggestion: months
...will be charged for fine as well as six month of sentence also. On the other hand,...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 630, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...r fine as well as six month of sentence also. On the other hand, the tax and reve...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, kind of, such as, as well as, to sum up, what is more, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1697.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.303125 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71193650541 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590625 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.4843726742 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.0625 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.8125 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322838867554 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103814172504 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0691276791354 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20531505255 0.151304729494 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0960760118465 0.056905535591 169% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.