The table below shows information and predictions regarding the change in percentage of the population aged 65 and above in three countries.
The given table compares 3 nations, namely Canada, Germany, and the UK in terms of their percentage occupied by the elderly aging at least 65 years between 1988 and 2000, as well as their expected figures in 2030.
Overall, it is evident that the popularity of at-least-65-year-aged citizens tends to expand over the period. Meanwhile, Germany was the country having the highest rate and is expected to maintain this rank in 2030.
Turning into detail, starting at 20.45%, the number for Germany increased significantly to 25.32% in 2000. A similar level of expansion was observed in that of Canada, which witnessed a substantial growth from 16.32% to 20.67% over the same period. By contrast, the figure for the UK was kept stable at approximately 14.2% in both years.
Regarding to the predicted proportion in 2030, German residents aged 65 years and above are unveiled to account for 30.42% of the total population, ranking first among 3 nations. This will be followed by a 26.35-per-cent rate of Canada, which will be exactly 6 per cents higher than that of the UK.
- Some people say that we do not need printed newspapers any more To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- the only way to improve safety of out roads is to give much stricter punishments on driving offenses.To what extent do you agree? 84
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- some people think that governments should ban dangerous sports, while others think people should have freedom to do any sports or activity. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 84
- The line graph shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a 6-month period in 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting main features, and make comparison where relevant. 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 339, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e at approximately 14.2% in both years. Regarding to the predicted proportion in...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, regarding, well, while, at least, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 901.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00555555556 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91172067409 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644444444444 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9935541681 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.625 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11493458948 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0460759440193 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0638949228186 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0705535782053 0.15604864568 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.046571616535 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.