Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists, but not local people. Why this is the case. What can be done to attract more local people to visit these places.
There are number of art galleries and old buildings which is very attractive and popular visited place by tourists rather than local community has no more interested to visit there. While, they feel more boring and waste of money. Therefore, the government should provide different types of facilities just for local community.
On the other hand, there are numerous stunning reasons that why local people not like to go museums and historical sites whether it's attractive place for visitors. Firstly, it natural fact that when individual approximately 2 or 3 times visit there afterwards their interest gradually to die. Moreover, if they go to museum with family members then every time purchase the entry pass ticket and rent pay for car parking, then they opine it just waste of time and money.
On the other hand, in today's era I would argue that it very challenging to attract the local people to visit the historical sites and art galleries which made their hometown. Secondly, if local authority take no charge from local people for entry and car space then getting a more chance local people encourage to visit there. Futhermore, if authority is organise the function in every months and invite popular celebrity then community more attract to see the favourite superstar with which automatic counting of visitors increase.
In conclusion, I believe that people like to see the new exhibition which relates to history and provide valuable data then local community again and again encourage to visit art gallery and old buildings.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-29 | Har preet singh | 61 | view |
- Some people believe that not all criminals should be kept in prison, but that some of them should be allowed to do unpaid work to help the community. Do you agree or disagree. 67
- Scientist predict that all people will choose to talk the same language in the future. Do you think is a positive and negative development. 61
- The table below gives information about a restaurants average sales in three different branches in 2016 53
- The use of mobile phone is as antisocial as smoking is banned in certain place so mobile phone should be banned like smoking. To what extend do you agree or disagree. 73
- Most countries want to improve standard of living through economic development, however, others thinks social value is lost as a result. Do you think advantages of economics development outweigh the disadvantages. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 208, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...etown. Secondly, if local authority take no charge from local people for entry an...
^^
Line 3, column 312, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'visiting'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'encourage' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: visiting
...ng a more chance local people encourage to visit there. Futhermore, if authority is orga...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 356, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'organised'.
Suggestion: organised
...isit there. Futhermore, if authority is organise the function in every months and invite...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 167, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'visiting'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'encourage' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: visiting
...cal community again and again encourage to visit art gallery and old buildings.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, while, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1290.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09881422925 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54102553332 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561264822134 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 423.9 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.0761085902 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.0 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289706951764 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120356982717 0.084324248473 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0844570094589 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179901462897 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0602975877635 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.