The movement of people from agricultural areas to cities to work can cause serious problems in both places. What are the serious problems? What measures can be taken to solve this problem?
The migration of men and women from rural areas to urban sides for employment can lead to serious predicaments in both places. The most prominent one among them is lack of food supply. While this can be solved by providing more options for employment in villages.
The phenomenon of more people shifting into cities may lead to a shortage of food production in the long run. This is because as many people move to cities, the population in villages decreases which means fewer people would involve in agriculture. This lack of involvement of people in farming is likely to affect the yield which may cause a decrease in the supply of food products in both villages and urban settings. For example, recent research reveals that in 2017, in India, agricultural production decreased by 30‰ over the last decade which was attributed to city ward movement of people.
However, the solution lies in opening up more vistas of employment in rural settings. This can be done by setting up more industries in these places which would employ a large number of people from the countryside area, thereby deterring them from migrating to urban areas for their living. This would, eventually, make a useful contribution in addressing the issue of more villagers going into cities for work. For instance, a similar initiative in Germany decreased the number of people moving into urban areas by 45% in 2015.
To conclude, plenty of grave issues may stem from the movement of people towards cities from the countryside which can affect the crops production negatively, whereas by providing better job opportunities in rustic areas the issue can be addressed effectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-01 | ggnsaini08 | 75 | view |
- You have just spent a week with a friend on holiday. When you got home, you realised you had left your wallet there.. thank your friend for the holiday.. explain that you left your wallet in their house.. give them instructions of how to send it back to y 56
- Organized tour to remote areas and community is increasingly popular. Is it a positive or negative development for the local people and environment? 73
- The movement of people from agricultural areas to cities to work can cause serious problems in both places What are the serious problems What measures can be taken to solve this problem 75
- You have just spent a week with a friend on holiday. When you got home, you realised you had left your wallet there.. thank your friend for the holiday.. explain that you left your wallet in their house.. give them instructions of how to send it back to y 67
- You have just spent a week with a friend on holiday. When you got home, you realised you had left your wallet there.. thank your friend for the holiday.. explain that you left your wallet in their house.. give them instructions of how to send it back to y 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 169, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ries in these places which would employ a large number of people from the countryside area, there...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 131, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'crops'' or 'crop's'?
Suggestion: crops'; crop's
...om the countryside which can affect the crops production negatively, whereas by provi...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, whereas, while, as for, as to, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1390.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05454545455 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69879924325 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530909090909 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 433.8 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.2330290678 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.833333333 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9166666667 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.91666666667 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239395634541 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0886384316485 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0649875483169 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157603417942 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0389654887758 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.