TPO 22
In my experience, teachers should share their political or social appointments in the classroom. The students need some comprehensive opinions and views about issue of social orientation to being good responsibility settlements of the country.
First of all, today, more and more young people are avoiding participating and taking attention on social problem. For example, they only think about how to become a rich and influential person in overnight. Actually, it seems to me selfish way which solely think about your happy life and make improvement in your life. This phenomenon is expanding gradually. So, teachers should make some appointment and give some advice through their views. Moreover, I would like to say if people want to make peaceful environment and philanthropic social, people have to tend heed the voices of others and mollify the problem as well as they could.
Secondly, why the young generations do not like to take part in the social program is because of lack of knowledge of politic. For example, most of my friends do not take an election because my teacher never taught us about how to vote the candidate and how to choose correct person. In this way, I think high school teachers would better to express their opinion and experience about political view in possible way.
Thirdly, as far as I am concerned students have to be critical in every problem. Even though your teacher hate your favorite candidate in government, you will be patiently listen and comprehend about what is the other's opinion. Maybe, you might see another side which you never imagine before. As well as, the teachers are not stupid people, they have own views which filtered through their mind.
All of all, focusing on other's criticism and praises are important way to think differently. Most importantly, improvements
always made by ideas.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In my experience, teachers should share ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...onsibility settlements of the country. First of all, today, more and more young...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fy the problem as well as they could. Secondly, why the young generations do n...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 274, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to correct'
Suggestion: to correct
...to vote the candidate and how to choose correct person. In this way, I think high schoo...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...about political view in possible way. Thirdly, as far as I am concerned studen...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 218, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
...listen and comprehend about what is the others opinion. Maybe, you might see another s...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ws which filtered through their mind. All of all, focusing on others criticism...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 31, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
...r mind. All of all, focusing on others criticism and praises are important way...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 130, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ferently. Most importantly, improvements always made by ideas.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, well, for example, i think, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1552.0 1977.66487455 78% => OK
No of words: 304.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10526315789 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74037442849 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592105263158 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 618.680645161 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.1299907392 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.2941176471 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8823529412 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.41176470588 5.45110844103 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 9.0 5.5376344086 163% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.236089414692 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.076458572812 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.150856017488 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 86.8835125448 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.