The mass media including TV, Radio and newspaper influence our society and shape our opinions and characters. What is your opinion?
The importance of employees' opinion in a company's decision making policy, which was always debatable, has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of using workers' view has sparked the controversy over the potential impact of this trend on the progression of the company. While it might be true that such approach will afford beneficial advantages to the company's success, it might also bring some hindrances to company's progression. This essay will elaborate how utilizing employees' opinion will give them great motivation to excel themselves and how it might lead to the leaks of confidential information and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are a <span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Cambria",serif;
mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;mso-fareast-font-family:"MS Mincho";
mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast;mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;
mso-ansi-language:EN-US;mso-fareast-language:EN-US;mso-bidi-language:AR-SA">innumerable</span> reasons why using employees' view plays a salient role in decision making policy, but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that such method will give them greater incentives, thus facilitating their performance. As an illustration, this policy is likely to give them a sense of being an indispensable part of the company, thus bringing out the very best in them. In addition, the utility of internal sources also help managers to avoid outsourcing and save money for better training for their current employees.
Nevertheless, some people adopt an opposing view and believe that involving the workforce in decision-making process might put the company in danger of confidential information leaks. For example, there are numerous cases in which firms went into receivership because their essential information was spread to external market, especially to their competitor due to the negligence or even intention of their employee. Thus, the company should keep such information beyond their reach.
In a nutshell, while taking advantage of employees' opinion should be part and parcel of company policy, but the company should strike a right balance.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-28 | gupta-vikas | 72 | view |
| 2019-07-09 | bita_harzandi@yahoo.com | 85 | view |
| 2019-05-30 | w.eldemardash@gmail.com | 61 | view |
| 2019-01-04 | bibivtvt21 | 11 | view |
| 2019-01-04 | bibivtvt21 | 11 | view |
- Team sports are promoted as a great way to maintain health and build character. However, violence between supporters and antisocial behavior has often been seen during such events. If sporting events can lead to such behavior, can team sports be good for 61
- Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do you support it or not? 77
- Team sports are promoted as a great way to maintain health and build character. However, violence between supporters and antisocial behavior has often been seen during such events. If sporting events can lead to such behavior, can team sports be good for 88
- Information revolution has changed the way of mass communications andhad some negative and positive effects on individual lives as well as onsociety. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 11
- Some people believe law changes human behaviour Do you agree disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 94, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , serif
...e:12.0pt;font-family:"Cambria",serif; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;mso-...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, nevertheless, so, thus, while, for example, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 6.10837438424 196% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1972.0 1207.87684729 163% => OK
No of words: 300.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 6.57333333333 5.00649968141 131% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 9.06512486891 2.71678728327 334% => Word_Length_SD is high.
Unique words: 179.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596666666667 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 576.0 379.143842365 152% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 148.376113557 50.4703680194 294% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 179.272727273 104.977214359 171% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2727272727 20.9669160288 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.36363636364 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 8.0 4.12807881773 194% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0307194251357 0.242375264174 13% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.016953583333 0.0925447433944 18% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0235620997122 0.071462118173 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0139389607886 0.151781067708 9% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0241924488221 0.0609392437508 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 23.1 12.6369458128 183% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 18.69 53.1260098522 35% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.4 10.9458128079 159% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 21.12 11.5310837438 183% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.32886699507 117% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 55.0591133005 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.