When designing a building, the most important factor is intended use of the building rather than its outward appearance. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people believe that the primary aspect when designing a building is its practical use rather than its appearance. However, I do think that both of them are equally important because of several motives below.
The intended purpose of a building is, of course, very important. In terms of commercial design, a building function is extremely urgent to attract customers. In fact, big glass windows make shop facades look hideous; however, they are essential tools to draw passengers and consumers attention since they are able to see all types of goods in the shop. From the social perspective, for large cities with high population densities, high-rise buildings are highly effective solutions although their outbound appearances are boring and unattractive. As a result, their function to provide citizens with affordable apartments is notably considered.
However, the outside appearance can be combined with its role. In some developed countries, there is a revival trend in designing buildings focused on both aesthetic and intended use quality. Although the ugly look of multi-storey car parks is undeniable since they are consequences of modern society, green and renovated buildings, coffee shops, offices and the like are appeared as solutions for combining beautiful design with useful function. In fact, the centre of Paris is a great example of the mixture of art and the use of buildings. It proves that the aesthetic architecture can possess character, which is not incompatible with its commercial function.
In conclusion, practical function is considered as much important as the building’s beauty. Therefore, the beautiful design of old construction should be preserved through generations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-08 | bqcuong | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-21 | Nguyễn Đỗ Phước | 11 | view |
| 2019-08-21 | Nguyễn Đỗ Phước | 11 | view |
| 2019-08-21 | Nguyễn Đỗ Phước | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-21 | Nguyễn Đỗ Phước | 78 | view |
- The process shows diamonds moving from the mine to the retailer 85
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.Why is this the case?What can be done about this problem? 73
- The graph below gives information about international migration to the UK, 1999 -2008 73
- The process shows how plants create food 82
- Topic: Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given in the protection of wild animals and birds. Do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, so, therefore, in conclusion, in fact, of course, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1464.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56653992395 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0256843628 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.623574144487 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.9279930564 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.571428571 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7857142857 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209024253791 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0732470484748 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0815698522282 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14241110113 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0978681016096 0.056905535591 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.