The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The proportion of water consumption for industrial, agricultural, and domestic purposes in six regions is given by the pie charts. Overall, it is noticeable that more water is used for agriculture in South America, Africa, Central Asia, and Southeast Asia while industry accounts for the vast majority of water used in North America and Europe.
Regarding the water consumed by agriculture in South America, this figure accounts for the highest at 71 percent. Similarly, these figures for this category are also the highest at more than four-fifths in Africa, Central Asia, and Southeast Asia. However, the percentage category of domestic use in South America is approximately 20 percent, which is more double than Africa and Asia (9% and 7%).
On the other hand, the vast majority of water usage in North America and Europe is for industrial use, which is nearly 50 percent as a whole. The percentages of water used for domestic purposes are about 15 percent in these areas, while the figure for agricultural use in North America (39%) is slightly higher than in Europe(32%).
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-09 | CharanpreetSingh | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | CharanpreetSingh | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | CharanpreetSingh | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | CharanpreetSingh | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-08 | kaka singh | 67 | view |
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the year 1990 and 2010. 61
- PIE Chart 11
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 42
- IELTS Task 1 TABLE 31
- IELTS Task 1 - TABLEThe table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, regarding, similarly, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 904.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10734463277 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73987418145 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514124293785 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 297.9 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.3406612076 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.142857143 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2857142857 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.85714285714 5.23603664747 188% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164638238022 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0944803424157 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0481311800401 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134331066199 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0487521386652 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 61.2550243902 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.