For school children, their teachers have more influence on their intelligence and social development than their parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
School children are at the impressionable age and the two most influences are their teachers and parents. While it is true that teachers are ones who impart their knowledge to their students, I also have to agree that children’ social development is generally influenced by their fathers and mothers.
In terms of intellectual development, school teachers play an important role in its progress. Dedicated teachers have a great exert influence on their students on their subjects. School children will be more enthusiastic in studying if their teachers have a great teaching method and knowledge resources. In fact, kids will study harder and do more research on the subject if they like the teacher who is in charge of that lesson. Besides, parents can reinforce their children’ passion for studying by assisting them in doing homework or buying reference books.
From the social growth perspective, parents undoubtedly have the strongest effect on their kids. Firstly, they are the ones who their children spend most of the time with. Consequently, they have more opportunities to teach and train their children behavior and social etiquette. Only by spending time playing and talking with their children can parents understand them and guide them in the right way to become good citizens. Secondly, school children usually see their parents as role models and imitate almost every action and ways of talking as well. For example, children generally inherit the love for animals from their parents. They will look at the way their parents treat their pets and form a similar action based on that.
From all the above-mentioned, although teachers have impacts on stimulating their students' studying progress, parents have a more significant role in forming their children social development. Both teachers and parents have to behave morally in order to educate the next generation to become good citizens for the future world.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-02 | Narges.s | 56 | view |
| 2019-01-18 | huathibichngoc.c3.ltt@gmail.com | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-02 | Narges.s | 73 | view |
| 2019-01-18 | huathibichngoc.c3.ltt@gmail.com | 61 | view |
- The chart below shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational settings in the UK in 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The charts below show the percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney, Australia, in 1997 and 2007. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The diagrams show the cross-sections of two tunnels, one joining France and Italy and the other joining two Japanese islands 73
- The charts below show the results of a survey conducted by a university library to find out the opinions of full-time and part-time students about its services. 73
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, consequently, first, firstly, if, look, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, for example, in fact, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1641.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32792207792 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79402500516 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522727272727 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.2322096064 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.5625 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.51910822015 0.244688304435 212% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.2030645299 0.084324248473 241% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101322839886 0.0667982634062 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.364521864892 0.151304729494 241% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0787703389604 0.056905535591 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.