The table illustrates the proportion of monthly household income five European countries spend on food and drink, housing, clothing and entertainment.
The provided table demonstrates the monthly expenditure structure of typical income family in five European countries in term of 4 certain items. A glance at the figure reveals that the majority of spending is for housing and food and drink, where clothing, additionally, entertainment have much less attention to.
it is clear to observed that the group of france, germany and uk shares some common in expenditure, in which, about one-third of their spending used for housing purpose (31%, 33% and 37% respectively). Likewise, clothing is the least expensive pattern in these countries when it just makes up 7%,15% and 11% in france, germany and uk consequentially.
Where two rest countries are concerned, the order of given pattern have some changes. Particularly, food and drink competes housing and become the most costly stuff with 36% in Turkey and 31% in Spain. As the cheapest element, Turkish just pay 12% of their cost in entertainment while Spanish pay more (15%)
- The charts below show US spending patterns between 1966 and 1996. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below. 61
- The line graph below shows the number of single-family homes constructed in the United States by region over a period of six years.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting in the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The graph below shows the contribution of three sectors- agriculture, manufacturing, and business and financial services- to the UK economy in the twentieth century 67
- IELTS 10 Test 3 Writing task 1 The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full time work did after leaving college in 2008 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison 76
- The bar chart belows the percentage of people in Britain living alone by age and sex in 2004/2005.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...tainment have much less attention to. it is clear to observed that the group of ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
likewise, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 815.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12578616352 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90779686762 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.672955974843 0.547539520022 123% => OK
syllable_count: 242.1 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5116699264 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.428571429 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7142857143 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.71428571429 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196331448065 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0802883082874 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0764502155135 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127757249941 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0920630118268 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.