The diagram below show some principles of house design for cool and for warm climates
The diagrams illustrate basic rules for designing houses in two separate climates namely cool and warm climates.
Overall, it is clear that the notable differences between houses in the two climate areas are the shape of the house’s roof as well as the construction of windows.
In the cool climate, we can see that the house has a high-angled roof to allow sunlight goes inside it through the window; whereas the roof in warm climate house has a peak in the middle in order to reduce heat and roof overhangs to shade windows from sunlight. There is only one big window facing directly the sun in the first type of house. However, the second one has two windows on both sides, under the shade of the roof, which are closed during the day and only opened at night to allow cool air flows inside.
Moreover, building material and insulation are also significantly different. The insulation and thermal building material are attached around the house which results in storing heat. On the contrary, houses in warm weather are constructed with insulation on the roof and the floor and also the reflective roof material to reduce the house’s temperature.
- The graph below gives information about international migration to the UK, 1999 -2008 73
- The charts below show the percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney Australia in 1997 and 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 72
- The tables below give information about the sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. 73
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.Discuss both views and giv 73
- The tables below give information about the sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, well, whereas, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 974.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94416243655 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6098480139 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558375634518 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.3886493678 43.030603864 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.75 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.625 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.25 5.23603664747 215% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222203631892 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100820065922 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126214511412 0.0843802449381 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171600417405 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.140549422322 0.0819641961636 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.