Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to make people recycle more is to make it a legal requirement.
To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
Problems regarding the amount of domestic wastes getting recycled have long been debated. Some insist that only in enacting a legal requirement will the citizen be obliged to enhance recycling. In this essay, I will show my strong support for the idea.
Firstly, individuals, albeit already equipped with common sense and general knowledge about the impact of environment on humans as well as the necessity of recycling, remain lack of self-discipline. Thus, unless there were a strict lawsuit concerning recycling wastes from households, under no circumstances would the garbage be rigorously sorted and recycled. Germany, along with many other developed countries, has tackled the issue for decades, hence the clean atmosphere for the residents and tourists.
Moreover, people often tend to adhere to the law when it involves strict punishment. Only in paying fine will people gain their awareness of the severity if they are not recycling their domiciliary trash. Singapore has applied a rule forbidding people to have chewing-gum in public places, which contributes to the cleanliness of this top cleanest nation. Meanwhile in Vietnam, getting rid of used gums is a common practice.
Last but not least, accumulating unsorted wastes from domestic uses is as severe as destroying the habitat of marine and terrestrial animals and the species themselves as the non-recycled wastes can be exposed to deserted land or to the oceans. Therefore, taking out household rubbish without recycling must be taken as seriously as other activities like illegal logging or poaching.
To sum up, I believe it's essential for the government to pass a lawsuit to enhance the responsibility to increase recycling among people. It also helps them to ameliorate their deteriorating discipline.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-21 | sumomoakiko | 84 | view |
| 2018-10-05 | tejaswi0924 | 73 | view |
| 2018-08-08 | Vinit panchal | view | |
| 2018-02-21 | Huda Atta | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 382, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun other seems to be countable; consider using: 'many others'.
Suggestion: many others
...orted and recycled. Germany, along with many other developed countries, has tackled the is...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 357, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
...leanliness of this top cleanest nation. Meanwhile in Vietnam, getting rid of used gums is...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, thus, well, while, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1513.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46209386282 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97784702199 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.678700361011 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.4611008234 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.071428571 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7857142857 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19985655697 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0592731770098 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0555946464561 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0949833475481 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0446136862995 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.