Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement?
What other measures do you think might be effective?
Pollution from burning fossil fuel is one of our modern day problem. Governments have taken several steps to deter this problem where charging high for petrol is one of them. Undoubtedly, this is one of the effective solution but other steps like imposing import duty for cars and improving public transport can help the process.
Firstly, in order to run a car people needs to buy gas so, simply by increasing the price of petrol will automatically discourage a certain portion of people to buy petrol. Specially, people who are on a tight budget, this will force them to think elsewhere. If we look closely then it becomes clear that the country where petrol price is relatively low tend to cause more air pollution. United Arab Emirates can be a good example of this, where per capita pollution is higher than any other country in the world.
Secondly, Only charging high for fuel everywhere may not bring our desirable outcome. Price needs to be higher where air pollution is relatively higher so that people will be reluctant to buy gas in that particular area. For example, Dhaka city in Bangladesh is crippled with air pollution so, the government may charge higher for petrol in Dhaka then any other places in the country.
Actually, by only increasing the price of petrol alone will not bring much fruitfulness. Other steps like imposing taxes to cars may help to reduce the number of cars overall. If we can reduce the car import from other countries then car usage will go down because only handful of countries manufacture cars. For instance, Singapore, where car tax is higher than the actual price thus helps to reduce cars. Beside that, it is the responsibility of the government to give people the option to find an alternative to their cars. Most people these days are forced to drive finding to alternative. Government needs to build adequate public transport system as reliable as reliable as private transports. Increasing import tax on cars and at the same time giving people the option to use public transport will bring down the fossil fuel consumption.
In conclusion, Charging high for petrol can be effective solution but only this method alone cannot confront the pollution crisis hence other steps need to be taken.
- Some people say that excessive noise should be a criminal offence. While other say that they should be free to make noise without limitation. 56
- Some people say that the education system is the only critical factor to development of a country. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 56
- At present time, the population of present countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with a number of older people.do the advantage of this situation outweigh the disadvantage? 61
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their wast 67
- Some people think that it is important to use leisure time for activities that develop the mind, such as reading and doing crossword puzzles. Others feel that it is important to give one’s mind a rest in leisure time. Discuss. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 260, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...his will force them to think elsewhere. If we look closely then it becomes clear t...
^^
Line 7, column 654, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'as reliable'.
Suggestion: as reliable
... build adequate public transport system as reliable as reliable as private transports. Increasing impor...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, firstly, hence, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, then, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1875.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 381.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92125984252 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56794605988 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490813648294 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 589.5 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.2700688056 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6842105263 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0526315789 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.68421052632 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113214327381 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0389501640811 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0332044196534 0.0667982634062 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0782909411658 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0283716369214 0.056905535591 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.