Do you Agree or disagree with following statement?
Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past.
Technology plays a major role in our day to day mundane. I disagree with the statement that Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. Infact, it has an ameliorating effect on the minds of the children. Technological advancements are enhancing the creativity of the children by providing them with gadgets that allow them to see things differently.
For instance, nowadays, smartwatches having a particular operating system, have made children enchanted. The children could play with the look of the watch by applying different themes and color combinations. Also, tools can be used online to draw objects and sketches which can be made by the children, letting their mind do the creative work. In the recent times, new softwares are being developed in order to build an outline of a design of a car. People could use such softwares and be more creative. We are in a world full of technology where it plays a major role in the lives of the people.
Computers, also are technological devices that help children do their work such as making presentations, accessing the internet etc. Children can also start their channel on Youtube by uploading some creative content which may outshine them in some way, like creating a Vlog and uploading it to the world wide web and making them youtube sensations. Smartphones also contributes to the creativeness in a child or a person. By visualizing information, children can learn fast. Editing picture can make them creative. Children can see the world through technology and they must be familiar as once they grow up, who knows who could make something related to technology.
Furthermore, we are surrounded with technology. Nowadays, even a Television has fun puzzles and games that help in nurture the mind of the young generation. Technology has a great impact that has made children more creative than they were in the past. Its because of the people who have creative minds, tend to make technological devices which we use now. Children could think out of the box, use analytical thinking and sharpen their creative skills.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-21 | hesam_75 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | Tharwat | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-15 | ela87urb@gmail.com | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-14 | ela87urb@gmail.com | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | star435 | 66 | view |
- A nation should require all its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 50
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of WLSS television station."Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increasingly more time to covering national news and less time to covering weather and local news. During the s 83
- "The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition."-Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disag 50
- Some people believe it is imperative for individuals living in developed nations to reduce their energy consumption and lead a more sustainable lifestyle, given the evidence for global climate change. Others believe that such drastic lifestyle changes are 50
- Do you Agree or disagree with following statement?Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. 3
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, so, still, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1267.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 252.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02777777778 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72043707954 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.503968253968 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 378.0 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 21.2450331126 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.5648337176 49.2860985944 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 66.6842105263 110.228320801 60% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.2631578947 21.698381199 61% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.57894736842 7.06452816374 37% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 16.0 4.27373068433 374% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 13.3589403974 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 53.8541721854 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.0289183223 65% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.01 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 8.42419426049 88% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 63.6247240618 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 10.7273730684 47% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.498013245 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.