The charts below show reasons for travel and the main issues for the travelling public in the US in 2009.
The bar graph illustrates some causes of travelling and the pie chart describes major problems for the travelling public in the USA in 2009.
Overall, it is immediately clear that the majority of Americans travelled for work while price of travel concerned them the most in 2009.
Looking at the bar chart in detail, to and from work was the most significant reason why Americans travelled in 2009, at around a half, which was followed by personal reasons and shopping, at 19% and 16%, respectively. The percentage of social activities or recreation accounted for a tenth, which was 4% higher than the least considerable cause, namely visiting friends and relatives.
Regarding the pie chart, Americans cared about price of travel the most, at around a third. Two following matters including safety concerns and aggressive ranged from 17% and 19%, which witnessed a difference of 2%. Out of the remaining problems, the proportion of highway congestion was as high as the total of two other issues.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-06 | Sai sushma | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-06 | Sai sushma | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-22 | Alaa Hanafy | 67 | view |
| 2019-08-19 | Luta | 89 | view |
| 2019-08-18 | vongocson | 84 | view |
- Some parents buy their children whatever they ask for, and allow their children to do whatever they want. Is this a good way to raise children? What consequences could this style of parenting have for children as they get older? 67
- The table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015. 73
- Nowadays some employers think that formal academic qualifications are more important than life experience or personal qualities when they look for new employees Why is it the case Is it a positive or negative development 78
- The graph below shows the average daily spending of three categories of international visitor to New Zealand from 1997 to 2017. 89
- The graph below shows changes in global food and oil prices between 2000 and 2011. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, regarding, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 844.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11515151515 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79918655375 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630303030303 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1329575168 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.571428571 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5714285714 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293807971048 0.215688989381 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135315920926 0.103423049105 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124683754113 0.0843802449381 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211090957063 0.15604864568 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110926303787 0.0819641961636 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.