The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.
The table illustrates the number of people who visited Ashdown Museum in two separate periods, before and after refurbishment. Additionally, the pie charts provide the level of visitors' satisfaction over the two periods surveyed.
Overall, it is clear that the total number of visitors increased significantly after the museum was refurbished. Moreover, the number of visitors who were dissatisfied was taken over by that of whom were satisfied.
There were 74000 visitors coming to Ashdown Museum during the year before its refurbishment; however, the number of visitors experienced a great increase of nearly 20000 people after the museum was renovated.
During the year before refurbishment, 40% of people visiting the museum felt dissatisfied, 10% higher than those found it satisfied; however, the figure for dissatisfied visitors dropped significantly to just 15% while that of satisfied people increased to 40% during the year after refurbishment. Meanwhile, the number of people felt very dissatisfied saw a small drop of 5% over the two periods; whereas the figure for those experiencing the great satisfaction rose to 35%. Finally, only 5% of visitors had no interests in answering the survey over the period shown.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-13 | ililmaidatuz | 80 | view |
| 2019-02-02 | huathibichngoc.c3.ltt@gmail.com | 73 | view |
- The charts below show the percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney Australia in 1997 and 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 72
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. 48
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport. 73
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. 78
- The line graph shows the cost for watching films. The pie charts show the change in the percentage of market share represented by the three forms. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, moreover, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1047.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51052631579 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08881011434 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521052631579 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 316.8 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.8607461445 43.030603864 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.875 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.385857469168 0.215688989381 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.177811233553 0.103423049105 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0881585161305 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.262105581985 0.15604864568 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0433582250905 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 61.2550243902 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 11.4140731707 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.