It seems that we have turned into a "throw-away" culture, as we are filling up our environment with so many plastic bags and rubbish.
Why do you think this has happened? What measures can you recommend for reducing this problem?
Nowadays, boon to the advertising industry and booming technological development, the vast majority of people use to throw away their old things so, consequently produce much more waste products and rubbish. This essay will illustrate the reasons and some practical ways to reduce the produced wastes.
These days, people tend to use more updated electronic devices which have advertised on TV. Although this kind of products leads to soar in the throw-away behavior of citizens, plastic packs of these devices are another crucial issue which increase the amount of non-biodegradable garbage. Also, people have less time to repair their old devices because of the long working hours that they have to endure. Recent statistics have shown that approximately 55% of UK citizens compel to throw away their mobile phones instead of repair it, which they find it more profitable and easier than repairing. Thus, it increases the plastic and metal waste material.
However, there are numerous ways to plunge the waste materials produced by a human. Firstly, framing a strict rule by the government to buying no more than two electronic devices of the same type, that will prohibit people from buying unnecessary goods which come up from their wealth. Secondly, constructing recycle factories to gather throw-away products and recycle them could be another measure. Finally, individuals have to lend or donate their outdated products to poor people instead of throw it away. A good illustration for this is recently established charity in China that buy old products from wealthy people and give it to people below the poverty line for free.
In conclusion, lack of the leisure time, adverts, and technological development play a vital role in compelling people to produce more throw-away products, and in this case, the government can decline the number of rubbish materials by the constitution of laws and building the recycling centers belong the individuals own measure.
- The government is responsible for protecting a nation s culture identity Some people believe the government should make sure that new buildings are built in a traditional style To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 78
- International tourism has brought enormous benefit to many places. At the same time, there is concern about its impact on local inhabitants and the environment. 73
- Some people believe the society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose, and can even be damaging. However, others argue that there are still some advantages of adverts. 84
- It seems that we have turned into a "throw-away" culture, as we are filling up our environment with so many plastic bags and rubbish.Why do you think this has happened? What measures can you recommend for reducing this problem? 78
- Today, a majority of children are raised by their grandparents due to the fact that their parents are busy working. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 111, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...evelopment, the vast majority of people use to throw away their old things so, cons...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, finally, first, firstly, however, second, secondly, so, thus, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1660.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.303514377 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77875204215 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578274760383 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.8811477947 49.4020404114 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.692307692 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0769230769 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130730842264 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.049427304138 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0266451524206 0.0667982634062 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0866772431048 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00819364560133 0.056905535591 14% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.