The table below shows the percentage of population by age groups in one town who rode bicycles in 2011.
The table illustrates the proportion of people riding bicycles by age in town in 2011.
Overall, it is clear that the number of user's bicycles had changed throughout the time shown. The age from 0-9 in both sexual was the highest percentage of participants. Also, the lowest number of people rode bicycles at the age 40-59.
The youngest age of men and women was the highest number of people riding bicycles respectively 50,3 and 51,3%. Furthermore, the age from 40 to under 60 was the lowest proportion with 12,3% of female and 85 of male joined cycling.
The number of people commuted by bicycles decreased significantly by age. But this number had a sight increase once more time at the age over 60 into around 18,5% for women and 13,2% for men.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-27 | tranhien297 | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-14 | haieric96 | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-25 | HO BAO NGOC | 84 | view |
| 2019-08-20 | Nhu Quynh Pham | 67 | view |
| 2019-08-20 | Nhu Quynh Pham | 61 | view |
- People tend to work longer hours nowadays Working long hours has a negative effect on themselves their families and the society so working hours should be restricted Do you agree or disagree 33
- The table below shows the percentage of population by age groups in one town who rode bicycles in 2011 61
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time .Do advantages of this outweigh disadvantages ? 67
- The line graph below shows difference sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2000 56
- The graph below shows US consumers'average annual expenditures on cell phone and residental phone services between 2000 and 2011. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 620.0 965.302439024 64% => OK
No of words: 132.0 196.424390244 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69696969697 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.38956122427 3.73543355544 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56723187938 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 75.0 106.607317073 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568181818182 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 186.3 283.868780488 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 19.6134520164 43.030603864 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 77.5 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207645287849 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110739169711 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0840008624153 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158375823384 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0924554328146 0.0819641961636 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 13.2329268293 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.68 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.18 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.