Task 2: The tradition that family gets together to eat meals is disappearing. What are the reasons? What are the impacts?
In contemporary society, modern families do not often eat meals together as often as in the past. There are some factors leading to this trend, and this may have several impacts on household and community as a whole.
There are some reasons for this phenomenon. First of all, people do not have lots of time to eat with their family member because of the hectic work schedule. Employees often spend time with their family members to complete their works. Therefore, family members today are rarely to eat meals with their family. Moreover, the development of the society which leads to a large amount of job and gives more chance to earn money than in the past. For example, some people often spend spare-time to seek out a new job in the evening after they finished work at their offices in the daytime because they need to find money that might help their young children have a good life.
This trend will bring some harmful impacts to every family on earth. First of all, parents do not spend time for their children, this will make children have bad habits because they lack guideline from parents. Furthermore, parents have less time to talk with their children, and that will lose the family affection. For example, according to my mind, I claim that young children have a bad habit due to their parents do not take care and teach them. Therefore, the rate of crimes increases in modern life because their parent does not teach them how to become a good person.
To sum up, the disappearance of family meals attribute to various factors. This has several influences on both families and societies.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | The Lazy Tiger | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-15 | hammy | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-05 | Anh Nguyen 2604 | 84 | view |
| 2019-10-01 | nhathoa | 90 | view |
| 2019-07-02 | ngotrancamtu | 61 | view |
- Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians, not individuals as individuals can do too little. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- Many people say that family is the most powerful influence on a child’s development. However, some people suppose that other factors (such as music, friends,…) have a great influence on children.” Discuss both views and give your opinions. 73
- The tradition that family gets together to eat meals is disappearing. What are the reasons? What are the impacts? 56
- https://www.testbig.com/sites/default/files/35726209_834780890050275_639... 11
- It is now possible for scientist and tourist to travel to remote natural environment, such as the South Pole. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, for example, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1329.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74642857143 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30427453279 2.80592935109 82% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514285714286 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 412.2 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6554183986 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.6 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114528159296 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0555019204702 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0538975911688 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0943165933866 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0417152012519 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.12 8.58950901804 83% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 78.4519038076 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.