Some people feel that certain workers like nurses, doctors and teachers are undervalued and should be paid more, especially when other people like film actors or company bosses are paid huge sums of money that are out of proportion to the importance of the work that they do. How far do you agree? What criteria should be used to decide how much people are paid?
An argument about the fairness of salaries in different industries has been discussed recently. Some people claim that professionals in some fields such as medicine and education are underpaid whereas workers of film industry and managers of companies gain incomparably more money. I agree that certain professions are overly paid and some underpaid, however some employees deserve their high wages.
It’s seems valid that imperative work of teachers, nurses and doctors is not compensated sufficiently in many countries. These professions require a university degree to be qualified, moreover, the burden of responsibility is significantly high as human’s life, health and future depend on their knowledge and proficiency. Meanwhile, the wage of these workers is average, and, sometimes, even below than that. For example, nurses and teachers in Russia often need to work overtime to maintain their livelihoods. And sometimes they quit their professions and acquire more profitable but less skilled jobs in other professional areas to financially be able to support their families.
On the contrary, people in managerial positions and movie stars are paid enormously high salaries. Given that qualification of top managers demands immense work experience, expertise and knowledge in many areas as well as tremendously high responsibility of a company’s prosperity and employees, their high income appears to be justified. That said, huge payouts to film actors seems inappropriate. Celebrity actors receive multiple millions dollars checks for their participation in blockbusters, but their contribution into humanity’s well-being is scarce, their responsibility is limited by compliance with contracts and education in actor’s career is usually dispensable. Over eighty million dollars income for 2018 of Robert Downey Jr. can illustrate how appearance in two movies can be paid as much as one year of work of 3500 teachers nowadays.
To conclude, I believe there is a lack of fairness in allocation of financial means among various professions in the modern world. Such criteria as the level of education and responsibility should be considered foremost in the decision-making regarding wages to ensure equitable distribution of salaries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-10 | BP Singh | 61 | view |
| 2019-08-20 | Taeyeon Kim | 96 | view |
- Nowadays an ordinary person can become popular through the Internet and TV media Is it a positive or a negative development Give your opinion and relevant examples 96
- You recently received furniture that was already damaged at the time of arrival. Write a letter to the manager of the shipping company about it and say– What furniture did you order?– What was the damage?– Suggest what needs to be done about it 73
- Many offenders commit more crimes after serving the first punishment. Why is this happening, and what measures can be taken to tackle this problem? 84
- You have recently attended a job interview which went well, but you are still waiting for the decision. Write a letter to HR manager of the company and say– Give details of the job.– Why do you think the interview went well?– Why do you need to know 89
- The idea of having a single career is becoming an old fashioned one. The new fashion will be to have several careers or ways of earning money and further education will be something that continues throughout life. To what extent do you agree? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 867, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...year of work of 3500 teachers nowadays. To conclude, I believe there is a lack o...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, well, whereas, while, as to, for example, such as, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1936.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.7619047619 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30536737969 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616071428571 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 606.6 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.0076133682 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.066666667 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.06666666667 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177450209684 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0582380326335 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525832500145 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101135438973 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0597674241456 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.04 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.