Task 1: The information below gives details about household income and spending on food and clothes by an average family in one UK city in 2010 and 2013.
The bar chart shows total income and how much of the income was spent on household, and the pie chart compares how the expenditure was broken down into 5 categories by an average family in a city of UK in 2010 and 2013.
It is clear that significant amount of income was used for food and clothes in both years. We can also see that UK residents spent an insignificant percentages of their household budgets on dairy products.
According to the table chart, in 2010, $14000 over $29000 of total income was utilized for buying food and clothes which was accounted for nearly 50 per cent of total earnings. In 2013, the amount of money using for the same figure of 2010 was $15000, which was 10 per cent higher than the last 3 years.
Looking at the spending categories pie chart, the majority of income was used for fruits and veggies in 2010 and 2013, with 20% and 35% respectively. Having the largest proportion in 2010, expenditure on meat and fish saw a decline of 10% in 2013, while in contrast, the amount of expenditure went for dairy products rose slightly, which was 20% of the total income. The figure for clothes was dropped from 22 per cent to only 12 per cent after 3 years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 149, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'percentage'?
Suggestion: percentage
...hat UK residents spent an insignificant percentages of their household budgets on dairy pro...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 975.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.4930875576 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41266135741 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529953917051 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.9355443415 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.875 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.125 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202225301021 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0993587837259 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0625299387893 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147217509647 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0606050219757 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.06 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.38 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.