In many schools and unversities, girls tend to choose arts subjects (e.g languages) and boys choose science subjects (eg.physic). What do you think are the reasons? Do you think that this tendency should be changed?
It is common in education systems all over the world that girls attempt to learn about arts subjects while boys are more interested in sciences. There are various reasons behind this point of views and I personally suppose that this trend need to be converted.
There there two primary reasons. One reason is that the society always exists a mindset of sexual discrimination. Individuals believe that women only have ability to learn art subjects. Furthermore, science subjects are not their field. Similarity, People also suppose that men have a good grasp of subjects belonging to sciences or technologies. For an example, women are believed to work as teachers or chefs while engineer, scientist are only for men. Another reason is gender-specific characteristic that women themselves are attracted more by arts subjects and men in favor of sciences. Due to the feminine, selecting art subjects helps most of woman to guarantee a successful career, likewise, thanks to the logicality of men’s brains, it is easier for them to pursue a science field.
I am convinced that this tendency should be changed as fast as possible. People have freedom to choose whatever they like instead of limiting themselves because of the gender mindset. There are a lot of women who are rejected to attend science classes just because they are female. For an example, in Japan, a medical university fixed the results of the entrance test of woman to rule out them. It is unfair for women and a number of women proved that they are able to do whatever men do, as a scientist, a politician and achieved such incredible achievements such as Marie Curie, Hilary Clinton. It also happened to male, there are wide range of men who famous for being hair stylist, doing make up like Nam Trung. Moreover, changes in people’ s mind will open the door to golden opportunities to youngsters who are in search of chances to show up themselves and balance the workforce.
In conclusion, there are many reasons for this situation and in my opinion, It should be changed for a better world.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-25 | bminhanh01 | 84 | view |
- Early technological developments helped ordinary people changed their lives more than recent developments. To what exent do you agree or disagree. 84
- The money spent by government on space programmes would be better spent on vital public services such as schools and hospitals.To what extend do you argee or disagree. 78
- Few languages are increasingly spoken in diffirent countries while the usage of others is rapidly declining. Is it a positive or negative development? 67
- Early technological developments helped ordinary people changed their lives more than recent developments To what extend do you agree or disagree 93
- In many schools and unversities, girls tend to choose arts subjects (e.g languages) and boys choose science subjects (eg.physic). What do you think are the reasons? Do you think that this tendency should be changed? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: There
...hat this trend need to be converted. There there two primary reasons. One reason is that...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 173, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to art', 'to be'
Suggestion: to art; to be
...e that women only have ability to learn art subjects. Furthermore, science subjects...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, likewise, moreover, so, while, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1733.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96561604585 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79876844675 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561604584527 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0845570451 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.2777777778 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3888888889 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05555555556 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214497794656 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0647611673195 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0492125160997 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13399286406 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0137440830341 0.056905535591 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.