At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support.
In my opinion, I strongly argue that sports activities are more important than social activities, and universities and colleges should invest more money in sports activities than in social activities.
First of all, colleges and universities care about fame, and giving more financial support to sports activities and social activities than classes and libraries make them famous. For example, in the United States, every university has their basketball team. It is because that the nationwide basketball games attract thousands of viewers, and a large number of audience will know these schools. On the other hand, if universities and colleges put their fund into classes and libraries, it would be no chance to show their name to millions of American who love basketball. As the result, they should put more money into sports activities.
Secondly, universities and colleges are crazy about earning money, and funding more sports activities and social activities than classes and libraries help schools reach more money into their pocket. Take the American football games for example. Universities and colleges in the United State train their own football teams to participate in the football league for colleges. With their football team, they can earn a lot of money from selling tickets and advertisement income, and this income is so big that many articles talk about they should share a piece of cake to their players. On the contrary, if schools invest their fund into classes and libraries, they would cost a fortunate on classes and libraries that earn no money. Apparently, it is not the outcome that universities and colleges are expecting to see.
Last but not least, schools care about the health of their students, and distributing more resource to sports activities and social activities can improve students’ health.
For instance, two years ago, my university used the fund from my government to build basketball courts, and these new courts attracted many students to play basketball after class. I usually played with my friends every day, and I lost 5 kilograms in just one month. Thus, it is really helpful for everyone’s body. Conversely, if universities and colleges just throw their money into classes and libraries, there is no opportunity to encourage students to work out their body.
In conclusion, universities and college should put more emphasis on sports and social activities. After all, sports and social activities bring schools a lot of fortune and fame and make students healthier.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-26 | AliOmar | 76 | view |
2020-01-23 | King harald | 80 | view |
2020-01-20 | Barana | 76 | view |
2020-01-09 | Lutfor Rahman Rony | 73 | view |
2020-01-07 | FarhadEbrahimi | 60 | view |
- As we acquire more knowledge, things do not become more comprehensible, but more complex and mysterious. 50
- At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support. 66
- TPO 21 - Genetically modified trees 73
- Ethanol is not a good replacement for gasoline. 85
- Requiring university students to take a variety of course outside their major fields of study is the best way to ensure that students become truly educated 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 344, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...games attract thousands of viewers, and a large number of audience will know these schools. On th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 820, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ties and colleges are expecting to see. Last but not least, schools care about t...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, conversely, first, if, really, second, secondly, so, thus, after all, for example, for instance, in conclusion, first of all, in my opinion, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 31.0 13.8261648746 224% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2142.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 403.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31513647643 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80313125638 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.468982630273 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 649.8 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.86738351254 428% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.3107060964 48.9658058833 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.736842105 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2105263158 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1052631579 5.45110844103 185% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296244388901 0.236089414692 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0977306054642 0.076458572812 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0876342792989 0.0737576698707 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179057072188 0.150856017488 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0590294775872 0.0645574589148 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 10.9000537634 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 86.8835125448 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.