People are sleeping less than in the past. Why do people do it? What are the effects of this?
It is argued that the amount of sleep among people is reduced as compared to previous time. The plausible reason of this trend is hectic schedule and the ramification is in terms of having deprived health.
The primary reason that people have less sleep in recent time is that busy lifestyle. This is because, in this contemporary era, people have to spend longer time at their work-place in order to cope up with the global competition. However, in the past, less plight had been faced by people as they only had to compete at domestic level only. In addition to that, people are doing multi-task because they are doing more than one job to earn more disposable income, whereas people used to indulge in a single profession through out their whole life in the previous time. Therefore, these could be the reasons that cause sleep deprivation in today's generation.
There are several possible consequences of this vogue. Firstly, due to inadequate sleep, detrimental implications can be seen on people's health. As a result, number of people are suffering from multiple illnesses such as dizziness and mental breakdown. Moreover, at a social level, government has to spend hefty amount of money to cure its citizens from various diseases which ultimately put strain on the national budget. Work efficiency also negatively affected because deficiency of
sleep makes people less productive. Consequently, it adversely effects the economy of the nation. Thus, having less amount of sleep cause above mentioned effects on an individual as well as on society.
By agglomerating above view points, it can be concluded that workaholic nature and world level competition are two reasons that people are sleeping less, and deprived health as well as pernicious effects on the development of the country are cardinal ramifications of this trend. Furthermore, government should spread awareness regarding the significance of sleep on fitness.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-26 | Jeet Harshad Parikh | 56 | view |
- Sugar consumption is too harmful Some say it is governments responsibility to limit sugar intake while others say it s individual who are responsible Discuss both the views and give your own opinion 64
- You share a parking area with several neighbors and have recently started having problems.Explain the problemsSuggesting ways to help the situationProposing a possible meeting 89
- Some people think that young people should choose their profession by themselves. Other believe that their parents choose for them. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 73
- In many countries today, parents are able to choose to send their children to single-sex schools or co-educational schools. Some people think that children going to single-sex schools have disadvantages later in life.To what extent do you agree? 73
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.In what has technology affected the types of relationships people make?Has this become a positive or negative development? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 519, Rule ID: THROUGH_OUT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'throughout'?
Suggestion: throughout
... used to indulge in a single profession through out their whole life in the previous time. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 486, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...egatively affected because deficiency of sleep makes people less productive. Cons...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, thus, well, whereas, as to, in addition, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1631.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24437299035 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81454643098 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588424437299 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.5607016549 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.9375 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4375 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6875 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.390791198172 0.244688304435 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11019548028 0.084324248473 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0640517809357 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198919525572 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0827183625561 0.056905535591 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.