Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Nowadays, governments are struggling to find the best way of public transportation. According to some, the authorities should allocate more money for roads than railroads, as this will cost less and the majority of population use roads more frequently on a daily basis. And there may be some merit in this view. Yet, in what follows it will be argued that the money ought to be spent on railways, since they are faster and more environmentally friendly.
Spending resources on railroads construction will enable people to save more time while traveling. By giving money to build new railways, numerous advanced trains that can develop high speed will be introduced to the public. In the modern world, more and more people are facing the problem of traveling from one place to another, and this process can be very time-consuming. it is hard to deny that people greatly value their time. Therefore, having access to fast trains might be the best solution to this issue.
another positive effect of opening more rail lines will be seen within the environment. For many years transportation has caused huge damage to nature. In many megapolises the air is very polluted and it is difficult to breathe. However, various studies have indicated that trains have lower amount of emissions than other forms of vehicles. Moreover, the pollutants produced by trains contain less harmful elements than the ones produced by buses and cars. Thus, financing railways construction will be beneficial for the environment as well.
In conclusion, it was shown that the government should invest money for building new rail lines, as the population will be able to save time and this will have a positive impact on nature. Though some believe that roads must be emphasized, since this is economically feasible and more people will benefit.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | Dungphung | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | BIBHU KALITA | 11 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | tranhien297 | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | pateldhruv1708 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-26 | geforce | 61 | view |
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world. 67
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The diagram of water cycle 78
- The graph below shows the consumption of 3 spreads from 1981 to 2007. 67
- Some people think that children's free time must include educational activities otherwise they will waste their time.What is your opinion? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 455, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ster and more environmentally friendly. Spending resources on railroads construc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 376, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...his process can be very time-consuming. it is hard to deny that people greatly val...
^^
Line 8, column 515, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ght be the best solution to this issue. another positive effect of opening more ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Another
...olution to this issue. another positive effect of opening more rail li...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 98, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'years'' or 'year's'?
Suggestion: years'; year's
...e seen within the environment. For many years transportation has caused huge damage t...
^^^^^
Line 23, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and more people will benefit.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1568.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22666666667 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76099016055 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.6642936135 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.2352941176 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6470588235 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.41176470588 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113293885851 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0365784195243 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0296159047687 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0777809230598 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0335009169901 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.