The chart below shows global sales of the top five mobile phone brands between 2009 and 2013.
The bar graph illustrates the top five cellphone companies’ sales during the period of 2009-2013.
Overall, people around the world spent the largest money on products of Samsung and Nokia over the period. Besides, there was an increasing trend for the sales of Samsung, Apple and ZTE compared to the decreasing trend for the others in the 4-year timescale.
In 2009, Samsung and Apple accounted for 240 million items and 20 million items, respectively. The quantity of products sold of the two firms then witnessed substantial improvements by 200 million items and 130 million items, respectively, sold in the next 4 years. However, the figure for ZTE remained steady around 50 million unites from 2009 to 2013.
Commencing at approximately 440 million products sold as the largest global sales in 2009, Nokia’s sales then moderately declined by 20 million items in 2011 before dropping considerably to its bottom of 250 million items in the end of the period, being overtaken by Samsung’s sales in 2013. Whereas, there was a gradual fall of the figure for LG between 2009 and 2013.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-08 | Fayna Faradiena | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-30 | Komalpreet Singh | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-16 | Mohamed talaat | 61 | view |
| 2019-10-13 | Qanh03 | 78 | view |
| 2019-05-04 | Sukeerty | 56 | view |
- The chart below shows global sales of the top five mobile phone brands between 2009 and 2013. 78
- Caring for children is probably the most important job in any society Because of this all mothers and fathers should be required to take a course that prepares them to be good parents To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view 82
- The graph below shows female unemployment rates in each country of the United Kingdom in 2013 and 2014.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choicesTo what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 78
- Some people believe that developments in the field of artificial intelligence will have a positive impact on our lives in the near future. Others, by contrast, are worried that we are not prepared for a world in which computers are more intelligent than h 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, so, then, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 930.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16666666667 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86800141192 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572222222222 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.1989884319 43.030603864 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.25 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170744770868 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0852314318795 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0794973632013 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12519649371 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.090123973212 0.0819641961636 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.