At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people. Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages?
It is true that nowadays, the number of young residents has become dominant compared to that of the old ones in some parts of the world. While the young population might have detrimental effects on society, it could also be significantly beneficial.
On the one hand, the increase in the youth population probably brings about numerous social problems. When there are more people in the working age, the labor market seems to be more competitive. As a result, underskilled and unqualified candidates are likely to face unemployment, the fact that leads to problems in decreasing standards of living. For example, unemployed people would find it challenging to afford to pay for rent, bills as well as foods daily, which are the fundamental needs of human beings. Furthermore, society is likely to encounter the risk of crimes and social disorders resulting from the low quality of life.
On the other hand, the prevalence of young people could also have positive impacts on the countries. Firstly, young residents are seemingly a good source of manual labors due to their stronger physical conditions in comparison with the elderly. There would be an advantage for countries targeting in industrial and agricultural fields requiring a large number of blue-color workers such as mining, food production. Secondly, the youngsters appear to be more creative in coming up with brilliant ideas and easier to adapt to new environments. Therefore, they are probably the main human resources contributing to innovation and development. Finally, the young population including a smaller number of pensioners helps the government to reduce the burden of providing assistance to support the old in society.
In conclusion, while the phenomenon of the young population can have several benefits, I hold that its disadvantages are more severe.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | venkatesh1018 | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-04 | aria etemadi | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-04 | Lucre96 | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-14 | Lauriel | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-07 | green1222 | 89 | view |
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people. Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages? 78
- The graph below shows the consumption of 3 spreads from 1981 to 2007 73
- The chart below shows a comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005. 61
- The two graphs show the main sources of energy in the USA in the 1980s and the 1990s. 61
- The chart below shows the percentage of difference in income between men and women form 1978 to 2008 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 407, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'affording'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: affording
...ployed people would find it challenging to afford to pay for rent, bills as well as foods...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 346, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...trial and agricultural fields requiring a large number of blue-color workers such as mining, food...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1551.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32989690722 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00108426614 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601374570447 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.6312150253 49.4020404114 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 110.785714286 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7857142857 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.5714285714 7.06120827912 192% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176135509507 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0521222190139 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0557984442554 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107033861561 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0633846890513 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.