The only way to improve road safety is to give much stricter punishments on driving offences. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In contemporary society, the number of accidents is increasing remarkably because of many factors. Some people suppose that the government should establish much stricter punishments on driving offences while others believe that alternative measures are more effective. In my viewpoint, the government need to improve simultaneously two ways to tackle this problem.
On the one hand, it has many advantages for road safety when punishments are stricter. Firstly, people are afraid of fining money because they are hard to earn enough money to pay for bills, therefore, they drive more carefully. For example, students at the university have little money from their parents, so they can not buy food and clothes but for having errors in traffic. In addition to that, not only money but also their licences may be kept by polices. They can not drive by themselves in this period, so it is very inconvenient to move around. When they know these consequences, they will try to have a good perception of driving.
On the other hand, the government needs to improve the ethics of inhabitants which is the origin of road safety. For the most part, teachers teach students about traffic safety in extracurricular activities. As an example, as long as seeing red light, children will stop and wait for some minutes to move green light. Moreover, events about road safety must be celebrated regularly. Polices spread how to join in traffic precisely and give imagines about serious accidents.
To conclude, the government should consider punishing strictly and improve ethics simultaneously.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-09 | alifdores | 73 | view |
| 2019-04-05 | ladungkiet | 56 | view |
| 2019-03-11 | thuyduong896 | 61 | view |
| 2019-01-15 | linhnganguyen | 73 | view |
- When designing a building, the most important factor is intended use of the building rather than its outward appearance. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- The information below gives detail about household income and spending on food and clothes by an average family in one UK city in 2011 and 2013. 67
- The graph shows the information about international conferences in three capital cities in 1980-2010. 78
- The table shows the amount of money donated in aid of technology of developing countries by charities in the US, EU and other countries from 2006 to 2010. 67
- The diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for the building industry. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, may, moreover, so, therefore, while, for example, in addition, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1332.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24409448819 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84958878442 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.625984251969 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 414.0 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.0041972046 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.8 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9333333333 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.93333333333 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166291502073 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0555767072267 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0516892589839 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.09855886712 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0209367505849 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.