Today the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, a number of companies work to sell what they produce, and in order to do this, powerful ads people face daily, are being used. Moreover, it is thought that the advertisements, producers make, is incentive for buying the high scales of popular products, and it is not important to sell necessary needs of people. As far as I am concerned, the majority of goods are not equivalent to the necessities of modern society.
To begin with, modernization of products is observed by people when they see them in advertisement and realize it. What I mean by this is that if there is even no necessity for something, people will want to obtain new modern, upgraded goods. That is because an advertisement is effectively realized, as a result, it attracts a lot of consumers. Smartphone and computers can be taken as an example. A number of manufacturers are well-known in the world, and their techniques for producing are developing increasingly. Thereby, new gadgets should be shown people so that these manufacturers can gain profit. In this case, marketing plays a great role to advertise by inserting qualities of these gadgets. Consequently, people who even suffer from financial problems tend to purchase these goods by getting into dept.
On the other hand, it should be accepted that everyone has not equal needs. In the other words, today a lot of popular products are advertised and this creates some probability of being necessity for some people. In addition, popular goods have usually high price, and if people who have high income is taken into account, this probability increases. That is because they usually buy these types of products. However, other people whose needs are different should be taken into consideration.
To sum up, today, advertisements of products are so effective that everyone in society want to buy them rather than necessary things. However, it can be thought that they may be main needs for others.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-04 | gulbakhyt_90 | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-04 | trucn | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-01 | Aydin03 | 11 | view |
| 2019-12-01 | Aydin03 | 11 | view |
| 2019-11-21 | khanhptk162 | 73 | view |
- Some people think that teachers should be responsible for teaching students to judge what is right and wrong so that they can behave well Others say that teachers should only teach students academic subjects Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 Summarize the information by selecting reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The pie charts show the average consumption of food in the world in 2008 compared to two countries; China and India. 73
- Some people think that the detailed criminal description on newspaper and TV has bad influences so this kind of information should be restricted on the media Do you agree or disagree with this statement Your essay should be about 250 words 67
- The diagram shows how chewing gum is made 82
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, if, may, moreover, so, well, i mean, in addition, as a result, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 13.1623246493 190% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1628.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04024767802 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92263341536 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53560371517 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.5681147561 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.4444444444 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9444444444 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161542603257 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0478275712653 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0362497155707 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110617624697 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0323054062195 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.