The flow chary illustrates the consequences of deforestation.
The chart gives you information on how the cutting of forest could bring deforestation.Overall, there are four main reasons of leading of deforestation.
To begin with the first step which is heavy logging equipment compresses the soil followed by soil becomes hard and “baked” then the rain water runs off which finally lead to flooding.The Second step is that fewer roots hold the top soil in place which lead to top soil erodes and because of that pioneer species move in,vegetation is degraded.
Third step is followed by five causes, caused by cutting of forest and which they are increasing the risk of burning which lead to waste wood from logging then micro-organism, feeds waste lost pioneer species, move in,vegetation is degraded and finally less biodiversity.And the final fourth step in consequences of clear cutting forest the plats return less prescription which lead to increased drought.
In conclusion,we can understand by the given information, how the clear cutting forest lead to enormous consequences.
- some people think a sense of competition in children should be encouraged.Others belive that children who are taught to co-operate rather than compete become more useful adults. 67
- Every year languages die out.Some people think this is not important because the life will be easier of there are fewer languages in the world. 61
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices. 61
- The line graph illustrates the proportion of population aged 65 over between 1940-2040 in a period of 100 years in three different countries.They are: USA, Sweden and Japan 73
- Proportion of populatio aged 65 and over. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 88, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Overall
...ing of forest could bring deforestation.Overall, there are four main reasons of leading...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 195, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...runs off which finally lead to flooding.The Second step is that fewer roots hold th...
^^^
Line 3, column 323, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...odes and because of that pioneer species move in,vegetation is degraded. Third...
^^
Line 3, column 332, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , vegetation
...because of that pioneer species move in,vegetation is degraded. Third step is followed ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 218, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , vegetation
...eeds waste lost pioneer species, move in,vegetation is degraded and finally less biodiversi...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 272, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: And
... degraded and finally less biodiversity.And the final fourth step in consequences o...
^^^
Line 7, column 14, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , we
...d to increased drought. In conclusion,we can understand by the given information...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, second, so, then, third, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 882.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41104294479 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34495946326 2.65546596893 126% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58282208589 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 40.0 22.4926829268 178% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 124.336237678 43.030603864 289% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 220.5 112.824112599 195% => OK
Words per sentence: 40.75 22.9334400587 178% => OK
Discourse Markers: 17.25 5.23603664747 329% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0464408547627 0.215688989381 22% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0368373084105 0.103423049105 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0488964712034 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0368373084105 0.15604864568 24% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0488964712034 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 24.4 13.2329268293 184% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.34 61.2550243902 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.7 10.3012195122 172% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.99 11.4140731707 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.0 10.9970731707 164% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.