Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society. Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this. Discuss both these view and give your own opinion.
Nowadays, children often do not know how to be good members of society. Some people assume that a good child depends on parent but some individuals think that school is the best place to learn this. Personally, it would be better to let parents teach children about this.
In the one hand, the contribution of parents for building the children characteristic is crucial based on countless reasons. One reason is that parents influence on them. As far as I know, children always follow their parent character and learn this. Thus parents have to fulfill the satisfactory act in order that children could ape them. According to the analysis table from psychologist, children living in separated families often have an anti-social behavior, even find it easy to commit crime. In contract, children living in close families often apply for the rules strictly. Another reason is that parents are the main factor that could teach them how to be good members of society. Parents have been with them since they were merely newborns, so parents should put their behavior in shape as a habit. One person used to say that parent could turn into teacher but teacher is not. Actually, parents teach the living way in order that children would bend into community and become a wonderful citizen. But teacher have to teach numerous students simultaneously so they could not care every person. For instance, parents wonder by themselves how to practice soft skills for children, thus parents teach them such as distinguishing between right and wrong or taking care of other people. Therefore, parents are the huge element in deciding how children would become.
In the other hand, I assume that school influence on them is important as well. Due to its necessary, a good member in society needs to have qualification and intelligence to promote social progress, so teachers could reinforce for them definitely. Children learning in education environment have a chance of acquiring knowledge, since then make their own better. Let imagine about the future if you do not have knowledge, you would never catch up with the society speed. Moreover, children could enforce soft skill that parents taught them through teamwork. For instance, in Vietnam article, a group student in high school won award in international competition due to mind team strongly.
In conclusion, I completely think that people should associate with two factors at above in order that children could develop in perfect way.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | kiana | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | Julian Eta | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-05 | koreets01 | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-01 | Chandrakumar Chanthujan | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-25 | Cho Oo | 61 | view |
- Some people think that planning for future is a waste of time. They believe it is more important to focus on the present. To what extent agree or disagree. 61
- Today more people are travelling than ever before. Why is this the case? What are the benefits of travelling for the traveller? 56
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free.Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- Nowadays many people choose to be self employed rather than to work for company or organization Why might this be the case What could be the disadvantages of being self employed 95
- Some people believe that the only purpose of films is to entertain. Others say films should have educational value. Discuss both view and give your opinion. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 143, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... children could develop in perfect way.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2077.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 407.0 315.596192385 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10319410319 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65324413413 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525798525799 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 624.6 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.0442278778 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.3043478261 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6956521739 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.65217391304 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282826490456 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0924168611474 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0794662637327 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206136728276 0.151304729494 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.137274437254 0.056905535591 241% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.