Would you agree or disagree that people of the past were much more happier and contented compared to today's people?
Currently, the world has changed on a massive level to a very different shape. The change which has occurred in the world has had a grave impact on the lives of people. There is undoubtedly sharp contrast in the frame of minds as well as the contentment level of people of this age. The new world order, has changed the shape of psychology of contemporaries.
Presently, with the advent of science and technology there has been the beginning of the Information Age.
Everyone is highly involved in the race of competition and earning. Today's individual, is much more stressed, exhausted and preoccupied with the notion of surpassing one's contemporaries. Resultantly, he has completely neglected the aspect of physical and mental health care. Unfortunately, bloodshed and genocide is widespread in all nukes and corners of the world. The prevalence of misery and depression has terribly deteriorated the mental peace and serenity of people of this age. Humanity is crying for mercy. Therefore, in such state of affairs, sadness and gloom has completely taken over our minds. No one can be seen completely blissful. This melancholy has damaged our spirituality and emotional stability. Fearfulness, apprehension and anxiety are the new way of life.
Contrarily, the people of the past were much more luckier as compared to today's partially stable man. In the past, there was much more joy and nature could be seen lot more flourishing. There was so much simplicity, less vulgarity, more sensitivity to pain and problems of other human beings. There was value of blood more than money. People were more considerate, kind and helping. There strong spirituality was the pillar of there noble personalities. There was lesser greed and more graciousness. There was lesser right snatching and violence. Crime rates we not that high. Overall, it was a much better place to live in.
conclusively, i would strongly agree that people of the past were much more happier and contented as compared to todays unfortunate beings.
- YOU ARE PLANNING TO STUDY ABROAD. WHAT DO YOU THINK YOU WILL LIKE OR DISLIKE ABROAD? GIVE SPECIFIC REASONS AND EXAMPLES TO SUPPORT YOUR VIEW. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives.Use specific reasons and examples to 90
- Question: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The extended family (grandparents, cousins, aunts, and uncles) is less important now than it was in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 94
- DO YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE WITH STATEMENT THAT SUCCESSFUL PEOPLE ALWAYS KEEP ON DOING NEW THINGS AND TAKE UP NEW CHALLENGES RATHER THAN DOING WHAT THEY ALREADY NO WELL.
- AN INSPIRATIONAL ENCOUNTER 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 167, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...eoccupied with the notion of surpassing ones contemporaries. Resultantly, he has com...
^^^^
Line 6, column 46, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'luckier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: luckier
...arily, the people of the past were much more luckier as compared to todays partially stable ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 59, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...ople of the past were much more luckier as compared to todays partially stable man...
^^
Line 6, column 501, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...was lesser greed and more graciousness. There was lesser right snatching and violence...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Conclusively
... was a much better place to live in. conclusively, i would strongly agree that people of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 15, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...tter place to live in. conclusively, i would strongly agree that people of the...
^
Line 8, column 72, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'happier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: happier
...agree that people of the past were much more happier and contented as compared to todays unf...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, therefore, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 43.0788530466 26% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1696.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 328.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17073170732 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97787673541 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557926829268 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 534.6 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 20.1344086022 60% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.6852323176 48.9658058833 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 65.2307692308 100.406767564 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 12.6153846154 20.6045352989 61% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.34615384615 5.45110844103 25% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.85842293907 311% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333875178074 0.236089414692 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0763567491787 0.076458572812 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.142632978158 0.0737576698707 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200754593638 0.150856017488 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.226071686097 0.0645574589148 350% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 11.7677419355 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.3 58.1214874552 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.82 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.0537634409 68% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.