The table illustrates the data about the forest area in millions of hectares in six different continents of the globe in 1990, 2000 and 2005.
The table illustrates the data about the forest area in millions of hectares in six different continents of the globe in 1990, 2000 and 2005.
Overall, there was an increase in the forest land in Asia and Europe since the figures for other places went down. Europe had the vast majority of forest area while Oceania covers the least hectares of forest land.
In 1990, Europe and Asia had a rise with the former increasing from 989 hectares to 998 in 2000 and finally to 1001 in 2005, and the later climbed from 576 to 584 hectares of land in 2005.
In contrast, the modest decrease happened in Africa and South America where the numbers dropped nearly 60 and 70 hectares respectively. There was only a slight drop in North America from 708 hectares to 705 hectares in 2005. The trend was similar for North America and Oceania. The figures for Oceania dropped from 199 to 197 hectares at the end period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-27 | SaranyaJeevesh | 73 | view |
- the changes made in a university office in 2005 and the current year. 67
- These days many people leave their country to work abroad and take their family with them.Do you think benefits of this outweigh disadvantages in terms of family development? 67
- People born today can expect to live longer than people in previous generations. What are some of the positive and negative implications of this phenomenon?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experienc 56
- People prefer to use internet for daily works such as texting and shopping instead of face-to-face communication. 61
- The line graph depicts the number of burglaries per thousand in Great Britain, Greece, Spain, and Norway from 2000 to 2009. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 132, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt continents of the globe in 1990, 2000 and 2005. Overall, there was an incre...
^^
Line 7, column 168, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ctively. There was only a slight drop in North America from 708 hectares to 705 h...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 750.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.62962962963 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.24158233354 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530864197531 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 222.3 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1177953033 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.75 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.398506719152 0.215688989381 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.194642150502 0.103423049105 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.309993767448 0.0843802449381 367% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.342305421892 0.15604864568 219% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.380985298338 0.0819641961636 465% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.