Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
While the Computer Data System has been developed by recent years, there is no doubt that searching for information such as scientific, business and academic thesis have become more efficiency ever before. Some people considered that the information should all be shared possibility to the public, while others complained that the valuable resources should be limited for its importance. In my opinion, both ideas have certain advantages, admittedly I consider some particular information consisted of too many important data to be share to the public.
The obligation of education system on citizen provided opportunities to search for the knowledge, more and more people have a high demand for craving variety of information. As a result, the open thesis data can fulfil the individuals' requirement, in order to improve their capacities and moreover, having a whole horizon on the knowledge field. Moreover, the sharing of resources such as scientific research will raise the human’s expectations for the future, believing that technology innovations, upgraded medical treatments have the functions to improve human living qualities.
Compared to these ideas, some people believed the important information should be limited. Firstly, the wide range of resources might produce unnecessary misinformation to the public. It is possible for Individuals to interpret the wrong value from the professional thesis, involved with specific, complex intentions meanings. Secondly, most of the thesis and researches are personal profits, in order to avoid fabrication from their opponents, keep the resources confidential is a must. And finally, the countries security. While business act the main role in many countries industries, it is important to keep secret on the local business finance statistic, and the industries researches. This action is the prevention of the war of economic attacked by other countries.
In conclusion, while individuals chasing for their own knowledge, they should accept the limit from the numerous information. Not only for the protections on some personal profits, but also for the whole country security.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | benj212 | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | Mouaz1994 | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | mirolinquency | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-08 | wondertran | 89 | view |
| 2019-12-28 | Asma Shahin | 84 | view |
- Surveys show that people are living longer in many countries But increased life expectancy has many implications for ageing individuals and for society as a whole What are the possible effects of longer living for individuals and society 71
- Every year several languages die out. Some people think that this is not important because it will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?Give reasons for your answer and include any 67
- Developments of technology are causing environmental problems. Some people think the solution is that everyone except a simpler life, while others believe that technology can solve these problems.itDiscuss both views and make your opinion. 78
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.Discuss both these views and gi 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 224, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...lt, the open thesis data can fulfil the individuals requirement, in order to improve their ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 506, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...onfidential is a must. And finally, the countries security. While business act the main r...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 774, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f economic attacked by other countries. In conclusion, while individuals chasing...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1825.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66770186335 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05692459994 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580745341615 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 575.1 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.2081304864 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.666666667 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4666666667 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.26666666667 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255475148063 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.080145291923 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10380285115 0.0667982634062 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140917402726 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104408863531 0.056905535591 183% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.07 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.