To what extent are people in your country interested in vegetarianism? Why?
People have been following different health practices and vegetarianism is scientifically proven as one of the most effective ways amid them. Vegetarian diets are actually familiar with many Vietnamese citizens, yet it is far from being their choice. Two underlying reasons will be pointed out in this essay.
To start with, a significant portion of the Vietnamese population have insufficient awareness of vegetarian meals, causing their rejection. Firstly, there exists a stereotype/ a fixed mindset that plant-based meals incline people to mineral and vitamin deficiencies, which, subsequently, result in fatigue, sleep disorders and even slow recovery from illnesses. As a result, only do a small number of people who fully conscious of the health benefits of vegetarianism embrace it. Secondly, it is widely believed that non-vegetarian recipes are an integral part of Vietnamese cuisine and culture. Hence, meat-based meals are misinterpreted as one of the national eating habits and vegetarianism should be of individual preference; otherwise, to some extent, the gradual erosion of traditions and cultural values will occur.
The second reason is that food safety concerns hinder Vietnamese people from being vegetarians. Food safety is, in fact, a thorny issue in Vietnam. Vegetables and fruits, two of the main sources of meat-free meals, are likely to be planted with uncontrolled use of fertilizers and pesticides, which is even sprayed a day before harvesting. Thus, the fear of the level of agricultural chemical residues not only does harm to consumers but also refrains them from adopting vegetarian diets. Furthermore, because it is time-consuming to prepare hearty vegetarian meals at home, eating out is sometimes an alternative; nevertheless, numerous people are skeptical of how vegetarian restaurants can ensure food processing safety and the level of this anxiety plummets each time there is any high profile food safety incident/ food safety scandal.
To conclude, vegetarians make up an insignificant amount of Vietnamese population since people are not fully aware of the beneficial impacts that vegetarianism brings on health as well as there are food safety fears among Vietnamese people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-24 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-22 | qaptpa | 56 | view |
| 2024-12-22 | qaptpa | 56 | view |
| 2024-12-17 | Kha Linh | 61 | view |
| 2024-12-08 | ankushgurumaa | 78 | view |
- Creative artists should always be given the freedom to express their own ideas (in words, pictures, music or film) in whichever way they wish. There should be no government restrictions on what they do. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- To what extent are people in your country interested in vegetarianism? Why? 89
- Discuss the consequences of deforestation. 11
- As most people spend a major part of their adult life at work, job satisfaction is an important element of individual wellbing. What factors contribute to job satisfation? How realistic is the expectation of job satisfaction for all workers? 84
- What could be the consequences of deforestation? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 384, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...ry from illnesses. As a result, only do a small number of people who fully conscious of the healt...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, thus, well, in fact, as a result, as well as, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1888.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60237388724 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14374291462 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614243323442 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 603.0 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 78.3962983299 49.4020404114 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.857142857 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0714285714 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1428571429 7.06120827912 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158196786095 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0548791807163 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0361295435324 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104593935841 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0232181073431 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.5 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.