In the modern world, people are no longer necessary to use food from animals or product from animals such as medicine and clothing. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The technological advancements in society, pharmaceuticals, and clothing from animals have drastically reduced, and this becomes a heated debate between people. Personally, I think that people do not need to use animals for these purposes because using animals do not have morals.
On the one hand, scientists cannot test drugs on the body of the human because it can affect awareness of reliable testing. People will feel fear if they have to undergo the processing of testing drugs. Moreover, some animals are using to make food because it has more nutrients and can give energy to people such as beef or seafood because some people are allergies with osteoporosis drugs. Therefore, they need to eat seafood or beef to give nutrient.
I agree with animals are not important to produce for medicine and clothing because of some reasons. First of all, using food or product from the animal is inhumanity and immorality. Animals also hurt, and animals also have emotional. For instance, when people have a cat or dog who will really love their boss. If their boss absents at home, they will wait for until their boss return to home. Therefore, people cannot use them to experiment or eating. Some people are really like using fur shawl from fur animals, this gives to the government to severe comments and stiff opposition from young people during the 21st centuries, and using animals to test drugs, this can make some wrong way because the body of animals does not similar to human.
Finally, using animals for food and medicine is not necessary because people can alter animals by other products which are made from other materials. Therefore, I believe that people do not need to use food and products from animals.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-17 | mikeboss268 | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-28 | nhathoa | 84 | view |
| 2019-09-10 | khanh202 | 89 | view |
| 2019-08-20 | dungdung | 84 | view |
| 2019-04-15 | daniel.funkiee | 84 | view |
- The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and in 2010. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.https://blogchiasekienthuc.files.wordpress.com/2016/11/map_1.jpg 61
- The graph below shows US consumers' average annual expenditures on the cell phone and national and international fixed-line and services in America between 2001 and 2010 61
- AN increasing number of people are buying what the need online. What are the advantages and disadvantages for both individuals and companies to shopping online? 61
- some people suggest that a country should try to produce all the food for its population and import as little food as possible. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- More and more people want to buy famous brands with clothes, car and other items. What are the reasons? Do you think it is a positive or negative development? 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, if, moreover, really, so, therefore, for instance, i think, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1442.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9724137931 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50655264918 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510344827586 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.3870779019 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.1333333333 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.86666666667 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.35327571958 0.244688304435 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136344854706 0.084324248473 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111601237159 0.0667982634062 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.257066314619 0.151304729494 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11090011818 0.056905535591 195% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.