Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect. In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
1)Interrupt and correct the mistake right away
2)Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leader
3)Say nothing
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
People usually have different actions when they hear of incorrect information during a presentation. While some attendance will immediately interrupt the event and raise their voice about it, in my opinion, I agree with the idea that we should wait until the end of the meeting or class to mention the mistake with the presenter. There are three reasons for my view which will be explored in the following essay.
First of all, the meeting leader may feel humiliated when his mistake is raised in the middle of the talk. As the result, he likely loses his inspiration and the entire presentation can be ruined due to a minor error. If it is the case, audience may miss valuable information which should be unveiled at the later part. My friend´s experience is a compelling example. His teacher invited a guest foreign professor to give a lecture for his biology class who later made a minor mistake. My friend interrupted this talk to point out the error making him so embarrassed that he could not continue his work. As a result, they missed the later important part of his lecture.
Secondly, waiting until the end of the talk to mention the incorrect information is a way to show respect to the teacher. He or she might have some personal issues with family, management or students itself, so, in those circumstances we should tell it of in a decent way like after the class hour I noticed that there was error in your statement, then, he or she will take in positive way and appreciate you. Besides, this action certainly gives him or her a chance to fix the error at later stages and listeners gain benefits from the provided information. I remember my recent attendance to the chemistry class where my teacher made a mistake on a formula. All students kept silence so that the lecturer could continue his interesting topic. Later, my professor discovered and fixed the mistake. My friend and I thus enjoyed a fruitful lesson.
Finally, people tend to be smarter than they actually are and cause silly mistakes in pointing out the error which is actually not. Hence, speaking at the middle not only shows your behavior as impolite but may also humiliate yourself.
In conclusion, I understand why some people prefer interfering the speech to correct the error but it seems to me that fixing it at the end of event is more appropriate due to the above mentioned reasons.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-16 | daoistwang | 73 | view |
2020-01-06 | naziii | 76 | view |
2020-01-06 | naziii | 76 | view |
2020-01-03 | kkang | 76 | view |
2020-01-03 | Bonjourkmm | 3 | view |
- TPO 36 - Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?For the successful development of a country, it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children (five to ten years old) than to spend money on univers 76
- TPO 22 - Ethanol fuel, made from plants such as corn and sugar cane, has been advocated by some people as an alternative to gasoline in the United States. However, many critics argue that ethanol is not a good replacement for gasoline for several reasons. 76
- TPO 35 - Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Famous entertainers and athletes deserve to have more privacy than they have now. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- TPO 29 - Paleontologists have proposed that one of the most common North Slope dinosaurs, the elephant-sized edmontosaur (Edmontosaurus), survived the winter by migrating south to more hospitable regions. Several arguments support the migration hypothesis 80
- TPO 28 - Robert E. Peary was a well-known adventurer and arctic explorer who in 1909 set out to reach the North Pole. When he returned from the expedition, he claimed to have reached the pole on April 7, 1909. This report made him into an international ce 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 256, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a decent way" with adverb for "decent"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...hose circumstances we should tell it of in a decent way like after the class hour I noticed tha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, but, finally, first, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, thus, while, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1974.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 414.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76811594203 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66568192278 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545893719807 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 624.6 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.9021222029 48.9658058833 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.7 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9 5.45110844103 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.85842293907 285% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109228889186 0.236089414692 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0281939079236 0.076458572812 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0311053502883 0.0737576698707 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0588013242866 0.150856017488 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0418663192821 0.0645574589148 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.