The graph shows the information about international conferences in three capital cities in 1980-2010.
Displayed in the line graph is the number of international meetings which were organized in three capital cities during the period from 1980 to 2010.
Overall, it is clear that more international conferences were celebrated in city A and city B in the first years of the period given, however, city C was prioritized in the final years.
Particularly, there were no meetings organized by city C in 1980, afterwards, this city had 10 conferences in 1985 before doubling with 20. Subsequently, after increasing slightly in 1995, the number of meetings continued to climb by 10 in 2000, which was followed by a decline to approximately30 at the end of the period.
With regard to other cities, city A began at 35 international conferences, which was higher than city B with 30. In 1990, city B witnessed a growth from nearly 20 to just over 25 whereas there was a fluctuation between 30 to32 from 1985 to 1995 in city A. Two cities were similar conferences with 27 in 2005, which was lower than city C, then city A and B went down to around 25 in the final year.
- The table shows the amount of money donated in aid of technology of developing countries by charities in the US, EU and other countries from 2006 to 2010. 67
- The diagrams illustrate the design of a single and a double room study area. 67
- some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that this money could be better spent on the human population. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 67
- The charts below show the percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney, Australia, in 1997 and 2007. 67
- The information below gives detail about household income and spending on food and clothes by an average family in one UK city in 2011 and 2013. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t down to around 25 in the final year.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, then, whereas, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 880.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60732984293 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89535896451 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55497382199 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 23.7847490152 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 125.714285714 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2857142857 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273960520132 0.215688989381 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144194760722 0.103423049105 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101750777941 0.0843802449381 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197465923585 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0930351385126 0.0819641961636 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.