College students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field.
Stating that college students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field, the only purpose of studying is making one's good career. Of course, it is undeniable that earning money is the main function of jobs. In my point, however, there are other considerations when we choose our filed. Considering the real meaning of study and the possibility that jobs which many people want are 'red ocean', it is proper for a student to choose his own interest.
Of course, many people would agree that secular result is the main criterion of a person. In terms of that we are living in highly capitalism modern society which stresses only results, it is desirable for an educator to recommend his students that having a good job is helpful to live in that society. For example, in biology, many institution and nations give more fund to molecular biology and build laboratories for the field. In the other hand, in non-molecular biological filed such as evolutionary biology or ecology or taxonomy, students or graduate students are hard to get in a research institution. This shows that choosing a prospective field can totally different from people who don't.
However, can we always say that those selections make us happy? My answer is no. There are many ways to make one's life better. Considering that we feel happy when we know something unknown before, it is reasonable to consider the real meaning of the study. For example, in science, most fields which are available for jobs are applicant science. In applicant science, it tends to need only simple techniques, not deep understanding. And they do not require making a theoretical base. It shows that people who assess a field with the only possibility of success may not realize the fun of studying deeply.
Moreover, considering that most people are thinking in the same way when deciding where to go, a student's chosen filed may be already red ocean. And it means that the possibility of success in any filed may be same, whether it is prospective or not.
For example, in the popular field such as Computer science and Economy, many people will choose those field and this makes a highly competitive situation. But in a non-popular field such as English literature and Taxonomy, although there are no many opportunities, if one could succeed in getting a job in those fields, there could be the bigger possibility than other fields.
To summarize, it is undeniable that our society's pervasive attitude to non-prospective field is cold. However, considering that happiness that we can get from only studying and high risk of popular field, it is proper to consider other fields. Only ignoring these views, parents could advise their children that going prospective filed is unconditionally better
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-30 | sandeshbhandari2 | 62 | view |
| 2019-11-26 | cnegus | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-22 | shingwa | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-28 | lucy2244 | 79 | view |
| 2019-10-25 | christine_cui | 54 | view |
- A recent sales study indicates that consumption of seafood dishes in Bay City restaurants has increased by 30 percent during the past five years. Yet there are no currently operating city restaurants whose specialty is seafood. Moreover, the majority of f 49
- An ancient, traditional remedy for insomnia—the scent of lavender flowers—has now been proved effective. In a recent study, 30 volunteers with chronic insomnia slept each night for three weeks on lavender-scented pillows in a controlled room where the 46
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the owner of Movies Galore, a chain of movie-rental stores."In order to stop the recent decline in our profits, we must reduce operating expenses at Movies Galore's ten movie-rental stores. Since we ar 46
- When old buildings stand on ground that modern planners feel could be better used for modern purposes, modern development should be given precedence over the preservation of historic buildings. 30
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of the Balmer Island Gazette"On Balmer Island, where mopeds serve as a popular form of transportation, the population increases to 100,000 during the summer months. To reduce the number of accidents in 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 329, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun institution seems to be countable; consider using: 'many institutions'.
Suggestion: many institutions
... that society. For example, in biology, many institution and nations give more fund to molecular...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 694, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...d can totally different from people who dont. However, can we always say that tho...
^^^^
Line 5, column 110, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...swer is no. There are many ways to make ones life better. Considering that we feel h...
^^^^
Line 7, column 96, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a student' or simply 'students'?
Suggestion: a student; students
...the same way when deciding where to go, a students chosen filed may be already red ocean. ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 242, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...rature and Taxonomy, although there are no many opportunities, if one could succee...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, moreover, so, for example, of course, such as, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 27.0 11.3162921348 239% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 50.0 33.0505617978 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2334.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 469.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97654584222 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65364457471 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79017726586 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 215.323595506 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486140724947 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 742.5 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 15.0 4.38483146067 342% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.5548210417 60.3974514979 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.25 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5416666667 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.54166666667 5.21951772744 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318991085365 0.243740707755 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0824765555755 0.0831039109588 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.141063163634 0.0758088955206 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170204582129 0.150359130593 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.13178101505 0.0667264976115 197% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 100.480337079 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.